It seems the problem here is that the watermark is transparent, and thus still contains information about the original image. Similar to how if you want to censor a part of an image, you should always use a single solid color because e.g. a blur can be inverted. But I guess that would degrade the quality of the watermarked photo too much.
Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
91–98 of 98 posts
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#92https://blog.acolyer.org/2017/08/18/deep-photo-style-transfe...
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#93This reminds me a bit of the common argument for locks: it keeps regular people honest. Watermarks are designed really to deter you from casually copying an image and pasting it on your site, unless you don't care at all about a watermark showing (e.g. a blog site with a few followers). I'm sure a mixture of the original computer vision technique plus some smearing on the original image could wash away even these ran…
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#94Example: When I go through Adobe stock photos, although I find the watermark initially annoying, I would quickly learn to "unsee" it in the next photos because I know how it looks like and where it is on the photo.
With varied watermarks, I'm not sure if the same mental technique can be applied. Shrugs, I may just be overthinking it.
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Supose you have 4 points on a box. If you randomly increase or decrease the location of each point by some random value say +-3% then averaged 100,000 of those boxes, you get a smaller box(1) surrounded by a larger increasingly blurry box. This is true even if no single picture shows that single smaller box, but it will show up on the average. (1) Rather than a true box the midpoints are going to be slightly buldging…
The article shows the result of this approach, and it clearly does not work well.
It does show a good average and simply moving the watermark was easily reversible suggesting detection of a watermark in an image was easy.
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#96Recently I took a 6 weeks vacation. One of my cameras had a dust particle that resulted in several thousand pics having a semi translucent watermark-like impression.
I think that the process shown here to defeat those watermarks would be ideal to batch-correct my pictures. (As of now, I have to manually correct the ones I love and leave the others as they are). Does anyone happen to know a tool that would allow me to do something like that?
As I remember, the same thing happened in one of my friend's wedding. The photographer they hired had one of his lenses with dust, spoiling a lot of pictures... It would be a really nice tool for those situations if they release that code.
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#97Honest question: Recently I took a 6 weeks vacation. One of my cameras had a dust particle that resulted in several thousand pics having a semi translucent watermark-like impression. I think that the process shown here to defeat those watermarks would be ideal to batch-correct my pictures. (As of now, I have to manually correct the ones I love and leave the others as they are). Does anyone happen to know a tool that…
Re: Making Visible Watermarks More Effective
#98Honest question: Recently I took a 6 weeks vacation. One of my cameras had a dust particle that resulted in several thousand pics having a semi translucent watermark-like impression. I think that the process shown here to defeat those watermarks would be ideal to batch-correct my pictures. (As of now, I have to manually correct the ones I love and leave the others as they are). Does anyone happen to know a tool that…