Earlier quoted context omitted.
Comparing Neo-Nazis to Muslims is incredible, and it says something ugly about your beliefs about Neo-Nazis and about Muslims. If, instead, you mean, civil rights for members of Muslim extremist organizations, then your comparison would be reasonable. So, you tell me. Should Al Qaeda be given permits for rallies across the US to recruit people to commit acts of terror? We aren't talking about people who merely say ra…
i never drew an equivalence between muslims and nazi's but go ahead and get offended if you want
ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
121–130 of 163 posts
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
I said "more terrorist attacks", which is accurate. I didn't make any claims about how deadly those terrorist attacks were. That Neo-Nazis aren't always good at terrorism is hardly a ringing endorsement or a thing to hold up as proof that we shouldn't be dealing with Neo-Nazi groups as terrorist organizations. Then again, the Oklahoma City bombing was the deadliest terror attack on US soil in our lifetimes prior to 9…
Generally we discard 9/11 from such discussions as it blows death toll comparisons out the window. Going post 9/11 stays both relevant to current times and removes the absolute worst events in both cases (Ok city, and 9/11). Doing comparisons without these cases we get similar numbers for both factions within some wide margin of error. Looking at this from a per capita perspective though we have Muslim Americans that…
But, the way so many have jumped to defend Neo-Nazis or redirect blame for their violence has me pretty shook. I don't really know how to process someone looking at Charlottesville and saying, "it's the fault of the left". It doesn't even make sense, much less help the nation heal, and a lot of people with a lot of influence are doing it.
It's pretty much terrifying that we have a president that is among the ranks of Neo-Nazi apologists, and that a large percentage of GOP leadership has said nothing. Maybe I'm giving moderate Republicans too much credit. Neo-Nazi leaders certainly feel vindicated by what's been coming out of a lot of mainstream Republican talking heads lately.
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#123Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand fighting fascism with fascism.
Exactly. I believe the best way to fight fascism is to have open dialogue and expose repugnant ideas to the court of public opinion. This requires free speech. The initiation of force outside of self defence is amoral.
To be honest, we don't know how to stop these ideas. The nazi party came into power with less than 40% approval and gained that power that nearly destroyed the world.
It's scary to say but there are theories floating around from hundreds of years ago that were made by different philosophers about the nature of these.
For example, the paradox of tolerance is one of these theories.
I'm not saying we should be violent, I'm just saying we have absolutely no idea how to deal with this.
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have only checked the first link however the NYT article from 2015 states "48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center." The pulse nightclub shooting alone killed 49 people. That is more than the entirety of the post 9/11 number white supre…
I said "more terrorist attacks", which is accurate. I didn't make any claims about how deadly those terrorist attacks were. That Neo-Nazis aren't always good at terrorism is hardly a ringing endorsement or a thing to hold up as proof that we shouldn't be dealing with Neo-Nazi groups as terrorist organizations. Then again, the Oklahoma City bombing was the deadliest terror attack on US soil in our lifetimes prior to 9…
Timothy McVeigh? Why do you consider him right-wing?
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
I said "more terrorist attacks", which is accurate. I didn't make any claims about how deadly those terrorist attacks were. That Neo-Nazis aren't always good at terrorism is hardly a ringing endorsement or a thing to hold up as proof that we shouldn't be dealing with Neo-Nazi groups as terrorist organizations. Then again, the Oklahoma City bombing was the deadliest terror attack on US soil in our lifetimes prior to 9…
> Then again, the Oklahoma City bombing was the deadliest terror attack on US soil in our lifetimes prior to 9/11, and was committed by a right wing extremist. Timothy McVeigh? Why do you consider him right-wing?
Some quotes:
"McVeigh was reprimanded by the military for purchasing a "White Power" T-shirt at a Ku Klux Klan protest"
"he spoke daily to his co-worker Carl Lebron, Jr. about his loathing for government. Deciding that the Buffalo area was too liberal, he left his job and began driving around the country, seeking out his old friends from the Army."
A letter he wrote to a newspaper:
"Taxes are a joke. Regardless of what a political candidate "promises," they will increase. More taxes are always the answer to government mismanagement. They mess up. We suffer. Taxes are reaching cataclysmic levels, with no slowdown in sight. [...] Is a Civil War Imminent? Do we have to shed blood to reform the current system? I hope it doesn't come to that. But it might."
"McVeigh introduced his sister to anti-government literature"
"For the five months following the Waco siege, McVeigh worked at gun shows and handed out free cards printed up with Lon Horiuchi's name and address, "in the hope that somebody in the Patriot movement would assassinate the sharpshooter." (Note "Patriot movement" was the way right wing extremist groups were re-branded in the 90s, just as alt-right and some other names have been used since.)
He made his meager living selling copies of The Turner Diaries (a novel that fantasizes about an armed revolution against the US government, and genocide of blacks, Jews, and gays: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Turner_Diaries) among other right wing literature at gun shows.
I don't see how he can be considered anything but right wing, and pretty extreme right wing, at that.
Source for all of the above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#127A slightly bit off topic, but as a European I would love to hear some intelligent, well thought, non provoking theories on why is America going through so much turmoil and polarization the last few years. Or has it always been like this?
HN is a terrible place to have such discussions, as opinions that go against the popular narrative are censored and the poster shadowbanned. You're better off searching for answers elsewhere.
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#128Words are not violence. My rights don't end where your feelings begin.
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#129> We ... take the clear position that the First Amendment does not protect people who incite or engage in violence. So does this apply to Antifa, BlackBloc, et al as well?
This is what this statement is about: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/nyregion/aclu-free-speech...
Re: ACLU of California Statement: White Supremacist Violence Is Not Free Speech
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. I believe the best way to fight fascism is to have open dialogue and expose repugnant ideas to the court of public opinion. This requires free speech. The initiation of force outside of self defence is amoral.
You could believe this, but that doesn't make it the proper way. To be honest, we don't know how to stop these ideas. The nazi party came into power with less than 40% approval and gained that power that nearly destroyed the world. It's scary to say but there are theories floating around from hundreds of years ago that were made by different philosophers about the nature of these. For example, the paradox of toleranc…
The Nazis first attacked and destroyed the free press and other free-speech institutions. Robust legal protections for free speech, and a culture of vigorously defending it, will prevent tyrants from gaining and maintaining power.
There is no 'paradox of tolerance'. The intolerant are intolerant, no matter which side they are on. Peaceful racists should have their say. We are all free to disagree and shun them. This isn't ivory tower. This is part and parcel of a free and open society.