Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually do that, I have legal access to Game of Thrones on cable but I still pirate it cause I want to watch it on the go on my laptop.
Putting the GO in HBO GO. Their naming scheme between HBO NOW and GO is also awful, and they even have separate apps.
Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
111–120 of 156 posts
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#112Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#113You're about a few years too late on this. Snowballs don't roll uphill.
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#114Stupid article. There is the atavistic fantasy of "you can watch everything you want at one low price", except the price is not a low price, it is a high price. The big anti-competitive problem with cable is that cable and satellite providers do not offer a choice of packages. You get basically the same thing with all providers. Hollywood loves it because they get paid no matter how good or bad the stuff they make is…
don't forget that producing all this content costs 10's of billions per year so someone has to pay for it. both the cost of production and the amount produced keeps increasing so prices need to go up to.
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#115There's a very simple solution for anyone worried about fragmentation: don't buy it. We got into a bad situation with cable because we didn't have a choice. It was either pay $80 per month for everything, or not watch TV at all. We have choices now, and Disney isn't going to be able to force their service on anyone. If people really like their new products and think it's worth the money, then fine. If people hate hav…
I'm not exactly sure what the flaw in this reasoning is called - tragedy of the commons comes to mind but that's not it; it's more like a prisoner's dilemma over a population - but if you're somehow not aware of this by now, this "solution" does nothing in the real world.
It's the same "solution" that is supposed to ensure bad politicians, bad companies, and so on do not take or keep power. "Just boycott X. Just don't vote for Y." There are more than enough people in the given population that trying to influence the landscape by trying to "rally the people!" to make the best decision for the whole rather than the simple or convenient one for themselves fails, literally every time.
Honestly, if you don't already know that, I don't know what rock you've been living under, but it must be comfortable under there.
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is there is going to be a minimum monthly fee of around 10$ to keep the lights on. So, fragmentation just increases prices without any net benefit for the consumer. The real killer IMO is most young adults just don't watch much TV in any form. If your watching ~10 hours a month then paying for more than one streaming service is just a waste. Don't forget it's the median viewer that's important not the ave…
> The real killer IMO is most young adults just don't watch much TV in any form. It's interesting, I'm 32 so on the upper end of millennial. We're supposed to be the multitasking, multiple screen generation. But I'll visit older relatives, say 55+, and they'll have the TV on constantly and just talk over it. I find it so distracting and honestly stressful, like when you're on a conference call, your boss is Slacking…
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Amazon is already doing this; if you have Prime, you can add on subscriptions to HBO, Starz, Cinemax, and a bunch of other channels for a monthly fee.
Amazon would crush Netflix if they would just build a good UX for their streaming. We have both Prime and Netflix and literally the only reason we don't cancel Netflix is because browsing the available content on Amazon is just painful in comparison.
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
word. unlicensed content delivery platforms still vastly superior in terms of quality and depth of content after over a decade and billions spent by netflix, hulu, etc. if you really want people to pay for a product you should offer better quality than the people who give it away.
The quality may be better, but can you stream pirated content on, say, an iPad app or on a pre-installed TV app? Netflix and other legal providers seem to have a real value proposition versus illegal providers, but I'll admit it's been several years since I've taken any interest in piracy.
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The real killer IMO is most young adults just don't watch much TV in any form. It's interesting, I'm 32 so on the upper end of millennial. We're supposed to be the multitasking, multiple screen generation. But I'll visit older relatives, say 55+, and they'll have the TV on constantly and just talk over it. I find it so distracting and honestly stressful, like when you're on a conference call, your boss is Slacking…
Humans can't multitask regardless of their generation
Re: Don’t ruin streaming by turning it into cable
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think piracy is the real competitor here. Unless they stop torrents they wont succeed here.
Make it easier than piracy, done! Today you cannot pay for a recent movie unless you go to a cinema (which I personally find an anachronism). To pay for older content, you need to find who is streaming it, pay a subscription with them, then find in what country they streaming it, pay for some fancy VPN service, setup the fancy VPN, restart your device and now watch it. Or, you can pirate it and watch it!