Live data from Hacker News

Tesla raises $1.8B

reuters.com

111–120 of 207 posts

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#111
post #14

"Tesla aims to boost production to 500,000 cars next year, about six times its 2016 output." What is the new goal to 2020? 2 years[0] ago they were expecting delivery 500,000 cars in 2020. If they will do that this year, maybe their new goal is to finally put a foot in the top 20 group of world manufacturers[1]? [0] http://www.businessinsider.com/everything-tesla-promises-to-... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List…

1 million by 2020

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#112
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$2 per user year?

From Twitter: Chris Moore‏ @ctmoore91 Aug 10 More Quick math on $SNAP marketing numbers: - $3.60 per existing user - $89 per acquired user to make revenue of $1.05 per user in... 3 months

That's a little on the high side, but it's not surprising. I work for a company that pays even more for new customers, though we have much higher revenue. An "acquired" user is like an asset when you sell your company.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#113

Let's talk about Solar City. Their product is intended to be a solar roof, indistinguishable from a typical roof from street level. Costs look to be in the $50,000+ range. The marketing is that homeowners will not only drive electric vehicles, but go completely off grid by storing the energy collected into Tesla batteries. In order for this to make financial sense, there needs to be an ROI for the homeowner. So... ho…

How much would it cost for a roof-mounted device that makes gasoline for you? Add your local transportation bill to your electricity bill and now tell me how many years it is.

That's an impossible question to answer without running real numbers. It might be cheaper to buy the gasoline (or electricity). Or not.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#114
post #45
post #39

Tesla sold $1.8 billion of eight-year unsecured bonds at a yield of 5.30 percent. That's considered junk bond level today. Historically, it's not a bad interest rate. It's an OK deal for Tesla.

Yes, it's a testament to how strange the financial environment is that people would lend such money speculatively at low interest. Those are the prevailing rates but I think the bond holders are getting a lousy deal considering tesla's actual risks

It's hard to quantify those risks when you have a rock star CEO. As long as Musk can keep the hype train going he'll be able to borrow money cheaply, which will make today's investment less risky.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#115
post #14

"Tesla aims to boost production to 500,000 cars next year, about six times its 2016 output." What is the new goal to 2020? 2 years[0] ago they were expecting delivery 500,000 cars in 2020. If they will do that this year, maybe their new goal is to finally put a foot in the top 20 group of world manufacturers[1]? [0] http://www.businessinsider.com/everything-tesla-promises-to-... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List…

I wonder if they mean Tesla is going to actually produce a half million cars next year, or if they're going to ramp up production to a half million cars per year by the end of the year.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#116

Let's talk about Solar City. Their product is intended to be a solar roof, indistinguishable from a typical roof from street level. Costs look to be in the $50,000+ range. The marketing is that homeowners will not only drive electric vehicles, but go completely off grid by storing the energy collected into Tesla batteries. In order for this to make financial sense, there needs to be an ROI for the homeowner. So... ho…

For the exact same reason Tesla won't be able to sell the Model S, because taking the difference between electricity and petrol prices, it will take 50 years to pay off the price difference from a Toyota.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#119

Let's talk about Solar City. Their product is intended to be a solar roof, indistinguishable from a typical roof from street level. Costs look to be in the $50,000+ range. The marketing is that homeowners will not only drive electric vehicles, but go completely off grid by storing the energy collected into Tesla batteries. In order for this to make financial sense, there needs to be an ROI for the homeowner. So... ho…

For the exact same reason Tesla won't be able to sell the Model S, because taking the difference between electricity and petrol prices, it will take 50 years to pay off the price difference from a Toyota.

> Tesla won't be able to sell the Model S

Citation needed.

Re: Tesla raises $1.8B

#120

Let's talk about Solar City. Their product is intended to be a solar roof, indistinguishable from a typical roof from street level. Costs look to be in the $50,000+ range. The marketing is that homeowners will not only drive electric vehicles, but go completely off grid by storing the energy collected into Tesla batteries. In order for this to make financial sense, there needs to be an ROI for the homeowner. So... ho…

Yeah, I kinda think they and the investors are hoping that electricity demand increases and the tech becomes much cheaper while their RnD is funded by millionaires who care about the aesthetics and the environment.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN