Live data from Hacker News

Ad blocking is under attack

blog.adguard.com

61–70 of 598 posts

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#61
post #3

The DMCA only applies to the US. Fork the repo and move on. It's time to forget about American hosting.

Sad but true :( If we could only remove the logjam in congress right now to get some real work done... currently the two parties are deadlocked in a power struggle and have completely forgotten why they're there.

also, few (if any) have the understanding of technology to affect appropriate reforms, which leads to industry lobbyists crafting legislation.

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#62

Via https://github.com/easylist/easylist/commit/a4d380ad1a3b33a0... by one of the Easylist maintainers: > If it is a Circumvention/Adblock-Warning adhost, it should be removed from Easylist even without the need for a DMCA request. Anyone know why he's saying this? Edit: I guess he's referring to the following via https://easylist.to/2013/05/10/anti-adblock-guide-for-site-a... : > Anti-Adblock should only be challeng…

I believe EasyList only accepts ad servers onto their list as a general rule, not adblock warnings/blockers.

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

homophobic or not, name-calling does nothing to advance the conversation.

Evidence does. Maybe you should learn the difference between just calling someone a name and providing evidence that their character is shit.

There are many alternative words available to describe someone of poor character. Words that are not homophobic slurs would be less prone to misinterpretation too. You may have presented evidence about Dan's character but your use of language was mostly informative about yours.

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think IPFS would be a better bet than block chain for this.

You might be interested to note the IPFS DMCA policy: https://discuss.ipfs.io/tos#8

Perhaps Dat would be better than IPFS? https://datproject.org

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#68
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Call me crazy, but this seems like a pretty honorable scheme for profiting off of content. Someone put effort in to create content, and has the option of putting this kind of paywall up. There is a consumer choice made to sell their own attention by viewing ads, pay a subscription fee for the content directly, or just move on to free content elsewhere. That said, most places where you pay the subscription fee will AL…

Perhaps. They are losing people like me though. I will never pay for a subscription to read a website and I will continue using adblockers to get rid of annoying ads. But they could still profit from me. There are less annoying ways to monetize which I might accept. For example affiliate links to buy products I am interested in (books, video games, gadgets). I'd be willing to pay % extra for some nice product in orde…

There's no way that affiliate links can pay the bills for publishers; numbers don't ad up (otherwise everyone would do it, and no one does -- well, actually, there's extremely limited situations where it works in some consumer corners, but those situations are limited and the total amount of revenue is also very limited). And how much extra traffic are you really going to refer? Ads are sold on the thousand -- $X per thousand (consumer can be cents up to maybe $8, B2B much higher). So even if you referred 200 people that's not even worth any effort. Unfortunately, if you're not going buy a subscription, register for a paper or click on an ad, you're probably not worth anything to the site anyhow.

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#69

Wonder if we could create a git in the blockchain... where DMCA just can't exist/happen since there's no central authority to ask to take stuff down...

It's possible and a proof of concept does exist but it's no more than that currently: http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittor...

Re: Ad blocking is under attack

#70
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sad but true :( If we could only remove the logjam in congress right now to get some real work done... currently the two parties are deadlocked in a power struggle and have completely forgotten why they're there.

> currently the two parties are deadlocked in a power struggle You mean since about 1790? There have always been two parties in congress (minus the era of good feelings) and they have always had opposing ideology, and have almost always blocked one another's proposals. It is very naive to think the current Republican congress is anything different or new. Their inaction is intentional - they need to pass their anti-c…

This paper tells a very different story: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....

It's true that partisanship and the two-party system have been a fixture of our system from the very early days. But there are matters of degree, and the degree today is at a peak.

Post reply on HN