Earlier quoted context omitted.
An "EmDrive" is a pseudoscience device. Poor calculation rigor is not the biggest error component in that number.
It's a good example of the problem though. Any drive that relies on reaction mass will take too long to cross the distance to even nearby stars. The rocket equation kills the plan unless you're willing to make an absolutely ridiculous starship. So you need a reactionless drive, which thus far is entirely science fiction. This is even before you start thinking about micrometeorites in the way (which long transits incr…
Yes, it's hard at our current tech level. But not nearly hard enough to explain the Fermi thing. I mean, take your scenario of solar system development: it'd be natural to exploit the Kuiper Belt and then the Oort, and the Oort blends into interstellar travel, as Freeman Dyson pointed out -- still quick on a geological timescale.