Live data from Hacker News

Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

blog.ffwll.ch

11–20 of 251 posts

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#12

There's also Linus's personal aversion to how GitHub implements many opinionated workflows. > I don't do github pull requests. > > github throws away all the relevant information, like having even a > valid email address for the person asking me to pull. The diffstat is > also deficient and useless. > > Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but github > instead decided to replace it with their own tot…

He really talks in extremes. I see all his points but it doesn't make these things pure garbage.

[deleted]

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#13

There's also Linus's personal aversion to how GitHub implements many opinionated workflows. > I don't do github pull requests. > > github throws away all the relevant information, like having even a > valid email address for the person asking me to pull. The diffstat is > also deficient and useless. > > Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but github > instead decided to replace it with their own tot…

He really talks in extremes. I see all his points but it doesn't make these things pure garbage.

Progress relies strongly on unreasonable people like Linus. Keep in mind that Github mutilated his baby so that's a pretty good reason to be upset.

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#16

There's also Linus's personal aversion to how GitHub implements many opinionated workflows. > I don't do github pull requests. > > github throws away all the relevant information, like having even a > valid email address for the person asking me to pull. The diffstat is > also deficient and useless. > > Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but github > instead decided to replace it with their own tot…

He really talks in extremes. I see all his points but it doesn't make these things pure garbage.

The comment was also made over 5 years ago. GitHub PRs have improved since then, though he may still find them deficient.

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#17

There's also Linus's personal aversion to how GitHub implements many opinionated workflows. > I don't do github pull requests. > > github throws away all the relevant information, like having even a > valid email address for the person asking me to pull. The diffstat is > also deficient and useless. > > Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but github > instead decided to replace it with their own tot…

He really talks in extremes. I see all his points but it doesn't make these things pure garbage.

[deleted]

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He really talks in extremes. I see all his points but it doesn't make these things pure garbage.

Progress relies strongly on unreasonable people like Linus. Keep in mind that Github mutilated his baby so that's a pretty good reason to be upset.

Maybe, but solving truly big problems relies on people working together. Linus (and the unfortunate proliferation of jackasses who emulate him) do more to hinder progress than help it.

Re: Why GitHub Can't Host the Linux Kernel Community

#19
post #8
post #4

This font gave me a headache Why not write with white on white? It would be so stylish

The font stack is just "Helvetica, sans-serif" but the weight is set to 100 which is extremely light. So if you have a very light variant of Helvetica installed it might be unreadable. Edit: or if your default sans-serif font has a super light variant installed, it might look very different from what was intended.

100 is not a font weight that makes sense for a large body of text no matter what the font. We call 300/400 "normal" for a reason.

100 is a "sometimes food" for that giant header or over-sized pull quote.

Designers that insist that entire documents/web-pages must be "light and airy and always 100 font-weight" have A) never struggled with contrast or accessibility issues, B) maybe don't understand typography. "light and airy" also means "easily blows off the page and is unreadable".

Post reply on HN