Live data from Hacker News

“Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

businessinsider.com

331–335 of 335 posts

Re: “Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

#331
post #266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They have the rule that you either get better and a promotion or you will be fired. The conventional term for this is "up or out".

Yes, but why aren't other companies do this?

Up-or-out relies on a constant intake of new staff. You'll have to do a lot more hiring, and you're applying a pretty strong personality filter on the company.

And as Applejinx says, the fact that someone isn't suited to the role above them doesn't mean they aren't suited to their current role. Up-or-out means tossing out the guy who knows his job well and is doing it well to replace him with someone who's never done it before and needs a training period; this is significant overhead applied to every job in the company.

Re: “Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

#332
post #329

Cuck.

We've banned this account for violating the guidelines and detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14945731 . We can unban the account if you email hn@ycombinator.com and we believe you'll not post like this again. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Edit: removed irrelevant item link intended to reference the guidelines.

What does this link have to do with things?

Re: “Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

#333
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We've banned this account for violating the guidelines and detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14945731 . We can unban the account if you email hn@ycombinator.com and we believe you'll not post like this again. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Edit: removed irrelevant item link intended to reference the guidelines.

What does this link have to do with things?

Nothing at all, thanks for the heads up!

Re: “Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

#334
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right they aren't advertised that way, but they can certainly be interpreted that way. There's rarely any sort of explanation of the numbering system in job posts. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that a III requires more experience than a I or II.

By not advertised I mean it simply isn't in the job posting. You apply to google and they talk to you during be process about the level. https://careers.google.com/jobs#!t=jo&jid=/google/software-e... https://careers.google.com/how-we-hire/?&src=Online/House%20...

Yes but I haven't been talking about just Google, and I have been talking about applying in the first place. My point was that some people may not apply, thinking that those jobs require more experience than they do. Think entry-level vs. junior.

Re: “Rest and vest”: engineers who get paid and barely work

#335
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conversely, most engineers only have three to five hours of really hard, sustainable technical work in them per day, and that's assuming a regular schedule, adequate sleep, good nutrition, no major emotional upsets going on... Now, that is work . No checking Facebook. No checking email. Process optimized so there are no long periods of waiting around. I have had periods when my day was six hours: five hours of hard w…

>Conversely, most engineers only have three to five hours of really hard, sustainable technical work in them per day, What makes you say that?

Measuring myself for a decade and a half, and some data from colleagues measuring themselves on my suggestion, and watching youngsters that I was mentoring.
Post reply on HN