Live data from Hacker News

JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

blog.jetbrains.com

51–60 of 96 posts

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#52
post #10
post #5

It looks like this is Ring UI. It looks like that is React. It also looks like it only runs on NodeJS. So this could be good news if you're willing to use JavaScript (NodeJS) as the server and use or switch to React style, JavaScript dedicated, back-end work. Is this something the Enterprise is willing to do?

Enterprises are already moving in this direction.

Facebook is a large geek shop; not how the vast majority of enterprises work or can work for that matter.

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#53
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like date pickers to have years on left, then months and then days; that would be more intuitive at least for me because I tend to choose from left to right.

YYY-MM-DD also sorts lexographically, making it the perfect date format.

ISO-8601 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#54
post #10
post #5

It looks like this is Ring UI. It looks like that is React. It also looks like it only runs on NodeJS. So this could be good news if you're willing to use JavaScript (NodeJS) as the server and use or switch to React style, JavaScript dedicated, back-end work. Is this something the Enterprise is willing to do?

Enterprises are already moving in this direction.

[deleted]

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#55

JetBrains is kinda crushing it. I've spent the last two days looking into Kotlin. I didn't realize not only that Kotlin can compile to JS but also that you can interact with say React from it. So you can build a full stack app in it, without ever touching JS. (I think that the JS compilation is still technically in beta but w/e). https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-fullstack-sample Combined with the fact that you can us…

Buying my first Mac in over 10 years to learn iOS development is on my bucket list. I also wanted to use it to play with .Net Core on a Unix environment. I'll gladly give JetBrains more money than I do now for Resharper to use Rider (cross platform C# IDE) and all of their other tools.

I really hope they nail it with Rider. I am so sick of Visual Studio. It just gets slower and slower. I have a 20 core machine, with 128gb of RAM and it constantly seizes up for seconds at a time, various components crash randomly, and things sometimes work and sometimes not: Go To Definition for example, or pressing F2 to rename. Whatever it is that suggests I add a missing using sometimes decides it can't do that and instead prefixes the unknown type with the fully qualified name (so it has the namespace, it prefixes the type I wrote, but it can't suggest adding the using). Debugging has been broken too, where sometimes it can't even show me what my local variables are never mind other vars, and it is also much slower than it was. And god help you if you have a large code file in your project. The moment you've opened it once, that's it everything starts falling apart and slowing to a crawl. If I copy a file in a .NETCore project then I have to close the solution and re-open it for the compiler to see it. Et cetera, et cetera.

It's obvious that things that shouldn't do a lot of work, do in fact do work. Like if I press Ctrl+C on some selected text. I simply expect it to put the text into the clipboard. But sometimes it will stall, put a dialog on the screen telling me it's doing some formatting and I need to wait! What the hell is it formatting?

Every member of my team is sick of it and it's negatively affecting our productivity, so if Rider is good then bye bye Visual Studio.

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#56
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Didn't like it. It is difficult to select an old year with the mouse. Mobile would be better since you would use the finger.

Why are you being downvoted for expressing an opinion?

I don't know, but it is common in HN.

I'd like to hear someone explaining why it isn't awful to use with a mouse.

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#58

JetBrains is kinda crushing it. I've spent the last two days looking into Kotlin. I didn't realize not only that Kotlin can compile to JS but also that you can interact with say React from it. So you can build a full stack app in it, without ever touching JS. (I think that the JS compilation is still technically in beta but w/e). https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-fullstack-sample Combined with the fact that you can us…

If clojure/script didn't exist, I'd be doing the same thing! Kotlin is a great language!

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#59
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buying my first Mac in over 10 years to learn iOS development is on my bucket list. I also wanted to use it to play with .Net Core on a Unix environment. I'll gladly give JetBrains more money than I do now for Resharper to use Rider (cross platform C# IDE) and all of their other tools.

I really hope they nail it with Rider. I am so sick of Visual Studio. It just gets slower and slower. I have a 20 core machine, with 128gb of RAM and it constantly seizes up for seconds at a time, various components crash randomly, and things sometimes work and sometimes not: Go To Definition for example, or pressing F2 to rename. Whatever it is that suggests I add a missing using sometimes decides it can't do that a…

Thank you for this. I have been using VS 2017 primarily for last 6 months as I enter the .net world and thought many of these complaints were me / my substandard machine.

Re: JetBrains Web UI components open-sourced

#60

JetBrains is kinda crushing it. I've spent the last two days looking into Kotlin. I didn't realize not only that Kotlin can compile to JS but also that you can interact with say React from it. So you can build a full stack app in it, without ever touching JS. (I think that the JS compilation is still technically in beta but w/e). https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-fullstack-sample Combined with the fact that you can us…

I was coincidentally looking at Ktor yesterday. I quickly ran into pages which are linked from the Getting Started guide (such at http://ktor.io/Features) which don't exist. Doesn't give the best first impression, but I gather it's a very new framework so I'm sure it'll be corrected soon...
Post reply on HN