Live data from Hacker News

Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

motherboard.vice.com

121–130 of 268 posts

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#121
post #38

UK's National Cyber Security Centre on MalwareTech's arrest: "We are aware of the situation. This is a law enforcement matter and it would be inappropriate to comment further." https://twitter.com/josephfcox/status/893160214664445952

that'll be the 'rapid response' unit leaping into action right there

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#122
post #94

I'm curious what charges are being brought against him. For all we know, this detention is completely unrelated to WannaCry. We shall see.

> For all we know, this detention is completely unrelated to WannaCry. No everyone has already determined 'wow he did a good deed' and 'us law enforcement bad'. The fact is he is linked to this event and a person of interest who they want to get more info from. As such it makes total sense they would detain him for some questioning searches and so on. If you are someone who stops a crime you will also get questioned…

> If you are someone who stops a crime you will also get questioned by the police. For all they know you are covering your own tracks and had a role in the crime. This is almost a cliche in movies and tv.

Yup. Law enforcement is not obliged to assume his innocence.

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess not everyone was happy that he stopped Wannacry. US agencies in particular.

This is utter nonsense. He didn't stop Wannacry. The Wannacry devs stopped Wannacry, if he didn't grab the domain it'd have been picked up by some other TI firm within minutes or hours.

I mean he had to notice that it was contacting that website, might not have been an obvious thing to look for.

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#125
post #31

No good deed goes unpunished. But why is DefCon still in the US? I think the creators of the conference might want to seriously think about holding it somewhere that isn't so hostile to pretty much everyone who attends.

You mean like Defcon Beijing?

Defcon Prague?

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is utter nonsense. He didn't stop Wannacry. The Wannacry devs stopped Wannacry, if he didn't grab the domain it'd have been picked up by some other TI firm within minutes or hours.

I mean he had to notice that it was contacting that website, might not have been an obvious thing to look for.

Nah, this was one of the first things you'd notice. No need to reverse the binary, you see the domain in pcaps when you run it.

Registering unregistered domains the malware connects to is a very obvious thing to do, in this case he got "lucky".

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#128
post #31

No good deed goes unpunished. But why is DefCon still in the US? I think the creators of the conference might want to seriously think about holding it somewhere that isn't so hostile to pretty much everyone who attends.

Because Las Vegas is in the US. DC/BH are just an excuse for security people to get a company paid trip.

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#129
post #128
post #31

No good deed goes unpunished. But why is DefCon still in the US? I think the creators of the conference might want to seriously think about holding it somewhere that isn't so hostile to pretty much everyone who attends.

Because Las Vegas is in the US. DC/BH are just an excuse for security people to get a company paid trip.

Having just attended DEF CON, I can say that I didn't get that vibe at all. The people who were there were very serious about the whole point of it all. I got a lot of value out of it as well.

Re: Researcher Who Stopped WannaCry Ransomware Detained in US After Def Con

#130
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I consider that a huge issue. No justifiable reason for that.

The license to for such illegal actions became legal after 9/11. This is nothing new. Police abductions happen in the pretty USA too.

Not sure why this is being downvoted, it's accurate.
Post reply on HN