51–60 of 268 posts
I'm curious what charges are being brought against him. For all we know, this detention is completely unrelated to WannaCry. We shall see.
Virustotal passive DNS shows that it was hosted for a time on the same server as his old irc, irc.voidptr.cz
https://www.virustotal.com/en/ip-address/188.190.99.148/info...
As much as this article contains very little information,this sounds very much like something the US will do. Whenever someone has to be the butt of some global joke .....somehow the US has to be the one to step up. Taking someone into custody for 18 hours without giving the family or press any information. How different is this from Iran or North Korea? Two things could've happened here IMO. They asked for the domai…
>> this sounds very much like something the US will do. As an American this sounds very much like something many, many, many countries around the world would do.
I couldn't imagine this story coming from, say, Germany or Sweden.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And if the FBI won't say either? https://twitter.com/MabbsSec/status/893146424753500163
I consider that a huge issue. No justifiable reason for that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>If no one knows where he is, it's more likely that it's what Marcus wants at the moment rather than what the FBI wants. Oh come on...
He could call his attorney have him release a statement right? Are you saying he is being denied access to a lawyer? Because that's a very serious charge and it would very silly of the FBI. IDK if I were arrested I would pray that the police abuse their power and deny me access to an attorney.
How many people traveling to the US from the UK, just to attend a conference, have an attorney they can call in the US?
This reminds me of Kevin Mitnick: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Mitnick#Arrest.2C_convic... Do we need to create some "Free Marcus" bumper stickers?
His business cards are amazing.
I got stopped by security once because it was in my wallet.
As much as this article contains very little information,this sounds very much like something the US will do. Whenever someone has to be the butt of some global joke .....somehow the US has to be the one to step up. Taking someone into custody for 18 hours without giving the family or press any information. How different is this from Iran or North Korea? Two things could've happened here IMO. They asked for the domai…
In Iran and NK detention without rights is an institutionalized practice. In US if you deny them a phone call immediately, you just threw away your own case.
This sends a clear message to the global whitehat security community: travel to the US at your own peril.
Or, maybe, there's a legit good or bad reason that he is unreachable? But let's just jump to the conclusion that he was blackbagged and in a CIA black site.
As much as this article contains very little information,this sounds very much like something the US will do. Whenever someone has to be the butt of some global joke .....somehow the US has to be the one to step up. Taking someone into custody for 18 hours without giving the family or press any information. How different is this from Iran or North Korea? Two things could've happened here IMO. They asked for the domai…
>> this sounds very much like something the US will do. As an American this sounds very much like something many, many, many countries around the world would do.
Why in heaven's name did he travel to the US?