Live data from Hacker News

Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

cnbc.com

151–160 of 196 posts

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#151

My experience on Amazon is that I try not to buy from sellers that aren't shipping directly through Amazon even if it's a lower price due to too many issues. I broke my rule recently yet again and purchased a "new" book on Amazon from a third seller that was about 1/2 the price of any Amazon shipper for the same item. When it arrived the book was not only not new, but was seriously damaged. Pages were all stuck toget…

Just contact Amazon directly they will give you your money back right away. Same exact thing happened to me. When the seller balked I went right to Amazon.

(Was this shipped from India by any chance? Mine was.)

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#152
post #60

Anecdotal experience buying on Amazon recently: Bought a new induction cooking pan. A nice one at $90. Didn't really pay much attention to who was selling it, just bought it like I do everything else from Amazon. It took about two weeks to arrive because it was from an independent seller, and was not 'Prime eligible'. When it arrived, I took it out of the box and was immediately disappointed. It was really heavy, and…

I can offer you the perspective of a small business employee that sells a number of products on Amazon without Prime fulfillment.

In your view, how much should you have paid for shipping for an item that you didn't want? Nothing?

Should the seller be responsible for shipping the item both ways?

There is already very little margin in selling commodity goods, especially when you consider Amazon takes 15% of gross value as a fee. Shipping in many cases changes the order from profitable to money-losing. If you try and price it in, you can't compete on cost which begs the question of why bother selling on Amazon in the first place.

The crux of the issue is this, though: Amazon doesn't give a shit about 3rd party sellers, nor can the 3rd party sellers provide the same level of customer service as Amazon can, mostly due to economies of scale. The whole 3rd party seller program is a testbed for Amazon, a research program to see how they operate and how Amazon can do it better and as soon as they realize how - the 3rd party sellers either get priced out by a race to the bottom with Amazon itself (they go directly to suppliers and cut everyone out) or by policies like these, which are ripe for abuse or eat further into seller margins to the point of operating at break-even or slightly in the red.

As a last note: Whenever I buy on Amazon, I buy Prime. The incentives of customers and 3rd party sellers are incompatible. If I were a customer for the goods that we are selling, I would never buy from our company.

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#153
post #118
post #60

Anecdotal experience buying on Amazon recently: Bought a new induction cooking pan. A nice one at $90. Didn't really pay much attention to who was selling it, just bought it like I do everything else from Amazon. It took about two weeks to arrive because it was from an independent seller, and was not 'Prime eligible'. When it arrived, I took it out of the box and was immediately disappointed. It was really heavy, and…

As you found from looking into the costs of return shipping, "free" shipping can actually cost a retailer quite a bit of their margin. They are attempting to remain price competitive by not pricing in the cost of returns. Amazon has a massive advantage here over small retailers because their shipping costs are much lower due to their scale. These sorts of shipping policies used to be the norm, until Amazon realized t…

People value free shipping because shipping is a scam in a lot of cases. I used to work for a company that made logistics software. One of our customers was one of those cable channels that hawks merchandise around the clock.

You would buy a ring (looks like a real diamond!), and when it arrived you realize "hey, this is just cheap costume jewelry" and send it back. They'd happily refund the price and express hopes you'd be happier with future items.

And they didn't care about the return, because they were charging you $8 (or whatever) for non-refundable shipping and only paying the shipper $1.20. So in the end they made $6.80 for selling you nothing.

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, I really am amazed how few consumer protections you seem to have! In the UK we're protected on two levels: firstly the "Distance Selling Regulation" means we have the right to cancel many contracts/purchases made not-in-person within 14 days of delivery. And secondly, if a good is faulty, not as described, or unfit for purpose then we have a right to a refund under those terms also. Probably because of these alr…

Wow, only 30 days? That's very very low. REI and other stores here in the US offer up to a year no questions asked return policy. I didn't realize how great that was compared to the UK!

> Wow, only 30 days? That's very very low. REI and other stores here in the US offer up to a year no questions asked return policy.

REI is unusually customer-friendly, because it's a consuner cooperative. Most US stores do not offer anything like a year no-questions-asked return policy (30 days, many-questions-asked is more typical.)

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The parent comment states "I bought a pan that arrived with a small defect". Under UK law, that would entitle him to a refund of product cost, delivery costs, and return costs (and Amazon's policies go further - even if not faulty, the seller must provide a UK returns address or pay the costs).

He didn't say anything about a defect. The pan arrived and he didn't like it. I don't think that's the same situation as a defect.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14911971 clearly mentions a defect. The parent post of that post matches your description though.

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#156

I am a big fan of internet platforms and everything but I just do not see a value in online shopping for physical goods. Sure it might be a good thing for shopping "disposable/every day use stuff" but why would I be buying something like a cooking pan (as someone mentioned) online ? If you know the cooking pan you want then yeah i agree amazong might be the most convenient thing but for stuff like that I just want to…

I can think of a few reasons:

Bigger marketplace/choices

Convenience - I don't have to wait until the store opens. I don't have to drive around to 10 different stores for 10 different products

Not everyone has has easy access to the stores they need to go to

Price

Time - I can order a pan while waiting for a client to arrive or commuting on the train.

Search and comparison tools

(There's disadvantages too, of course.)

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#157
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He didn't say anything about a defect. The pan arrived and he didn't like it. I don't think that's the same situation as a defect.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14911971 clearly mentions a defect. The parent post of that post matches your description though.

Oh, I was looking at the wrong parent.

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#158

From a consumer point of view, this is a good thing. It sucks to have a different experience depending on whether something ships from Amazon or a third party, especially as their easy return policy is one of the main reasons I continue to use Amazon and pay for Prime. I can understand sellers frustration, but to my mind that's the price of having your products featured on Amazon. I've never encountered a third party…

tl;dr; Only Amazon really benefits, buyers will eat the cost and their experience might be worse. Smaller sellers will suffer the most.

Mostly it let's Amazon hire fewer people in support department - they don't have to deal with the occasional refused return ("I dropped this glass item on tiles and it broke into a million pieces, I'd like my money back. Do I have to ship it back to you?" - paraphrased actual return request)

The only other plus side I see is that customers can ship the return immediately. Not much of a difference as sellers are now required to respond within 12h (7 days a week, including holidays) and if they fail to more than 5-10% of the time (I don't remember what the exact target is now) they risk having their Amazon account closed.

From consumer point of view it's not a good thing:

- it offers no new customer protection. sellers are already required to accept those returns (unless customer shoots themselves in the foot - see example above) and provide a prepaid shipping label (in most cases). Amazon enforces that

- it removes the option seller has to accept a return that is out of policy

- it increases the number of unnecessary returns (and having to reorder). Often a one sentence explanation/hint is enough

- it doesn't make the cost of shipping to customer refundable, unless the customer lies about the reason why he's returning the item. Right now those false claims account for at least 3/4 of all returns (source: my wife runs a business that does part of the sales through Amazon, other sellers we know having the same problem)

- it generates extra costs for sellers. that cost is ultimately paid by buyers

From seller point of view it's not a good thing:

- makes fraud easier. For a larger seller that's simply a cost of doing business that will be shifted to buyers anyway. For a small seller it can be end of business if for example a Chinese company that copied their product decides to make a couple dozen fraudulent returns (not that uncommon)

- removes an option to use your own cheaper shipping label - even sending just a few hundred package a month gets you really nice discounts

- removes an option to use your own shipping label that makes the return safer (like extra insurance or using a courier). ANYTHING customer ships back makes Amazon consider it a valid return - even if it's damaged, something completely different, etc the seller will have to provide a refund. It's next to impossible to stop that refund

- removes an option to receive feedback from the customer making the return to improve in the future

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#159

Yes, this is very consumer friendly on the surface. But remember that Amazon operates is retail arm with little or no profit margin, even with the benefits of scale keeping their costs low. Small businesses don't have the same benefits of scale, and will be forced to close down when their revenue drops below their costs as a result of too many returns. And that is ultimately bad for consumers.

Amazon doesn't need independent sellers anymore.

Third party sellers are a a cash cow - they take all the risks and Amazon is just a middleman. They make up half of Amazon's sales. Amazon's ultimate game plan may be to drop their retail business altogether and become just a logistics company.

Re: Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

#160
post #60

Anecdotal experience buying on Amazon recently: Bought a new induction cooking pan. A nice one at $90. Didn't really pay much attention to who was selling it, just bought it like I do everything else from Amazon. It took about two weeks to arrive because it was from an independent seller, and was not 'Prime eligible'. When it arrived, I took it out of the box and was immediately disappointed. It was really heavy, and…

I can offer you the perspective of a small business employee that sells a number of products on Amazon without Prime fulfillment. In your view, how much should you have paid for shipping for an item that you didn't want? Nothing? Should the seller be responsible for shipping the item both ways? There is already very little margin in selling commodity goods, especially when you consider Amazon takes 15% of gross value…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN