Earlier quoted context omitted.
Forgive me if I don't quite find your source credible, since it appears to have been written by a volunteer, and since it doesn't actually give concrete evidence on maximum recommended dose.
nutritionfacts.org is vegan propaganda and shouldn't be confused with a good source. Nutritional science is hard and we have very limited ability to actually study it and make strong recommendations. Cherry-picking phrases and results from limited power studies just muddies the waters. Here's the founder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Greger > In his lectures, videos, and writings about nutrition he tries to…
- Nutritionfacts.org is non-profit - Their conclusions are based on studies. - They're not trying to sell supplements or food products.
Do they omit certain studies that contradict their overall conclusions? Sure. That doesn't mean anything to me.