Live data from Hacker News

Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

lowendmac.com

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#11

The author does not write about the broader context of the demise of the screen saver. Energy Star played a part, who needs their monitor on anyway? Operating Systems also came with their own screen savers plus the people that liked screen savers were not prone to buying software, usually software was pirated or unlicensed in the 90s. Therefore this crowd were happy with openGL Windows screen savers. This was during…

That wasn't really the purpose of the article, though. It was an interview with the creator of an iconic piece of software from a time that ushered in widespread use of personal computers. Should historians not write about the Battle of Gettysburg because it should never have been fought in the first place?

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#13
Another way of looking at this is that the end of screen savers means the end of a small culture.

I don't remember where I got this idea but I coded up a screensaver very quickly once. The idea was it periodically would make a 1/2 x 1/2 size copy of the screen and then copy it to the bottom right, bottom left and top center of the screen. This converges on a fixpoint called the Serpinski Gasket. On Windows it was pretty easy to write such screen savers. I'd be interested in doing it under X Windows but the people who maintain X Windows (or DEs) are not interested in maintaining end-user-facing variety in screen savers. And if you can do it it means that rogue software can exfiltrate image captures of your running programs.

I also want to quickly mention PointCast [1] as an example of another current in the screensaver sea.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PointCast_(dotcom)

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#14

How can the article not mention Pyro!? There was some tribal attachment to your screensaver, if I remember right, and I was on the Pyro! side... http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/02/business/the-executive-com...

The writing style of that article was excellent. No flourish, no bullshit. Also:

> An aside about clocks: This is as good a time as any to reset your computer's internal clock. For I.B.M. and I.B.M.-compatible machines, type ''TIME'' at the DOS prompt, and for Macs bring up the control panel. Then call 900-410-8463. You'll get a recording from the United States Naval Observatory's atomic clock, and you can't get much more accurate than that. The call costs 50 cents.

Does it still work?

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#15

The author does not write about the broader context of the demise of the screen saver. Energy Star played a part, who needs their monitor on anyway? Operating Systems also came with their own screen savers plus the people that liked screen savers were not prone to buying software, usually software was pirated or unlicensed in the 90s. Therefore this crowd were happy with openGL Windows screen savers. This was during…

I think it is even better than that, screen savers were a hack that existed in the interstitial time between CRTs and LCDs because technology would not move fast enough.

The first CRTs were actually used as memory[1] and the fact that the phosphor 'remembered' what it had shown was an engineered thing. Then CRTs were used as displays that you could 'burn in' the contents was a problem [2].

That started the notion of not keeping the same thing on the screen all of the time which was "hard" to do for character driven terminal screens, but possible with bitmap driven screens. The first 'screen saver' I saw was at PARC on an Alto of all things which was drawing lissajous figures during idle time. They also appeared in arcades where screen burn was an issue so the game would display something else to avoid screen burn.

And THEN the energy crisis hit and everyone was looking at saving energy so CRT manufacturers added a simple circuit that if you disabled vertical sync they would detect that and actually turn off the electron beam completely. (horizontal sync was still needed to maintain the high voltage field at the front of the CRT). But by now a lot of people had grown attached to screen savers so turning off the screen was avoided.

And then we got to LCDs where running a screen saver was actively bad for the screen since there was no way to turn off the LCD backlight which was the weak point of the LCD screen and running a screen saver put more hours on that resulting in a faster death of your LCD.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_tube

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_burn-in

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#16

If you are sufficiently old and autistic, you can still buy the licensed flying toasters screen saver from a Japanese company called infinisys: http://en.infinisys.co.jp/product/flyingtoasters/index.shtml I was.

Toast doneness can't be adjusted. Lame.

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#17

The author does not write about the broader context of the demise of the screen saver. Energy Star played a part, who needs their monitor on anyway? Operating Systems also came with their own screen savers plus the people that liked screen savers were not prone to buying software, usually software was pirated or unlicensed in the 90s. Therefore this crowd were happy with openGL Windows screen savers. This was during…

And now we live in a time when I regularly hear people refer to their desktop wallpaper as their "screen saver" at work. I'm occasionally tempted to point out that a static wallpaper is the complete opposite of a screen saver, but then I remember that nobody likes a pedant (even an accurate one).

> I remember that nobody likes a pedant (even an accurate one).

It's just that nobody likes being corrected. Try correcting someone's spelling or grammar on any Internet forum (including HN), and you'll be hit with a barrage of "you know what I meant" and "language changes" retorts.

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#18

If you are sufficiently old and autistic, you can still buy the licensed flying toasters screen saver from a Japanese company called infinisys: http://en.infinisys.co.jp/product/flyingtoasters/index.shtml I was.

Sure can. It's on both my work and home macbooks. Works fine with multi-screen setups.

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#19
post #14

How can the article not mention Pyro!? There was some tribal attachment to your screensaver, if I remember right, and I was on the Pyro! side... http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/02/business/the-executive-com...

The writing style of that article was excellent. No flourish, no bullshit. Also: > An aside about clocks: This is as good a time as any to reset your computer's internal clock. For I.B.M. and I.B.M.-compatible machines, type ''TIME'' at the DOS prompt, and for Macs bring up the control panel. Then call 900-410-8463. You'll get a recording from the United States Naval Observatory's atomic clock, and you can't get much…

If you want to do it manually for some reason, https://time.gov/ works.

Re: Aggressively Stupid: The Story Behind After Dark (2007)

#20

If you are sufficiently old and autistic, you can still buy the licensed flying toasters screen saver from a Japanese company called infinisys: http://en.infinisys.co.jp/product/flyingtoasters/index.shtml I was.

I'm less interested in Flying Toasters, than I am in the rest of the After Dark collection, which I would pay for if I could find in its entirety.
Post reply on HN