Live data from Hacker News

GitHub was down

status.github.com

31–40 of 253 posts

Re: GitHub was down

#31
In the face of a lack of information, HN comments begin to throw around unfounded speculation & tongue-in-cheek jokes run rampant. I suppose that in the absence of information, many stay silent, & the remaining see a thread lacking comments

& now we've got this meta one in the mix

Re: GitHub was down

#33
post #23

Dang. It's too bad their customers' source control files aren't distributed and decentralized, or they could keep working and ignore this.

The problem is not the files, it's the project management stuff (issues and PR tracking). That is a SPOF. If they could decentralize that, then nobody would care if they are down half the time.

I wonder why you can't export them as a read-only git repository. (Read-only to avoid people messing around with the history)

Re: GitHub was down

#36
post #10

Pages Builds Failure Rate spiked to over 2000%. I don't know how that's possible, but it seems pretty bad.

Guessing absolute failure rate previously not encountered by current graphing tool, incorrect scaling factor. Or, it was decided at some point that always reporting 0.000XXX% failure rate, even if correct, didn't offer an intuitive metric, so zeroes were intentionally truncated.

Re: GitHub was down

#38
post #27

I would love to see a chart of traffic to other sites when GitHub goes down. My bet is that HackerNews and Twitter both get significant spikes from all those bored developers.

Its not like your editor is down.

Re: GitHub was down

#39
post #26

I had to change a username from capitalized to uncapitalized and use my updated remote afterwards, apologies if I broke it for everyone.

Did you know that if you type "Google" in the Google search box you can break the internet? :|

(BTW, this was meant as a joke... although I'm not discarding that kmfrk broke Github just yet!)

Post reply on HN