51–58 of 58 posts
A similar conceptual example: https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/comparison.html
Mention whether your SSG supports reStructuredtext, markdown, etc.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tables are good for tabular data. I'd argue that it's potentially arguable that this may actually be tabular data. Either way, now that you mentioned it, I don't know whether my knee-jerk reaction would have been that it's good or bad, or if I'd even notice it at all, heh.
It's pretty hard to argue a chat transcript as tabular data. Sam Knock, Knock. Eric Who's there? Sam Justin. Eric Justin who? Sam Justin time for dinner! http://html5doctor.com/a-little-more-conversation-with-dialo...
For a minimalist static site generator, I think it's hard to beat just writing your own that does exactly what you want and nothing else. In a hundred lines or less of Python, you can have your minimal generator, know exactly how it works and how to extend it, and be able to refresh your memory on conventions/configuration with thirty seconds of scrolling through the source.
It takes longer to read the introduction to most static site generators than it takes to read and understand a proper minimal static site generator's source.
Ah this is quite interesting... I was working on making my own one of these. I might just use this instead!
There are already two or three static site generators out there ... https://staticsitegenerators.net/
Ivy looks great, though.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tables are good for tabular data. I'd argue that it's potentially arguable that this may actually be tabular data. Either way, now that you mentioned it, I don't know whether my knee-jerk reaction would have been that it's good or bad, or if I'd even notice it at all, heh.
It's pretty hard to argue a chat transcript as tabular data. Sam Knock, Knock. Eric Who's there? Sam Justin. Eric Justin who? Sam Justin time for dinner! http://html5doctor.com/a-little-more-conversation-with-dialo...
Ah this is quite interesting... I was working on making my own one of these. I might just use this instead!