Earlier quoted context omitted.
B2 is horribly unstable, has limits left and right and most of all, the latency is horrendous. You will be better off using any standard OpenStack provider. That way you won't have a lock in, and great performance (in my testing). E.g. OpenStack Swift on OVH. Sure it's a tiny bit more expensive. But you get a mature cross-provider API and better performance. Even for huge chunks of cold data, I wouldn't want to use B…
What are some good OpenStack providers? and are there any that can 11 nines durability?
Wasabi – Simple storage solution
101–110 of 164 posts
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#102Wouldn't it be funny if this was just a market test/exercise, using actual S3 as a backend, just to see if it gets any traction before building own HW/SW solution?
Kind of like how most wasabi in the U.S. isn't really wasabi, it's just horseradish? lol
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#103Some quick observations: - Their performance claims are incredibly biased. Amazon S3 has far better write performance than their claims. - They claim 100% S3 compatibility but it fails a large number of API calls using Ceph’s s3-test. I didn’t dig into this too far but they do claim “No need to change your S3-compatible application” so changing my endpoint + credentials should have worked. To their credit - PUT, GET…
>Their first round was debt financing. Are you suggesting that Wasabi might go away because, maybe, this is not the "traditional" valley model?
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#104Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#105On the same page on HN there's another Wasabi that's a fire alarm for deaf people.
It's definitely one of the most common codenames in IT, together with Phoenix, Firebird and Panda (and in the enterprise, all greek/roman gods).
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#106Wouldn't it be funny if this was just a market test/exercise, using actual S3 as a backend, just to see if it gets any traction before building own HW/SW solution?
~ dig +short console.wasabisys.com
38.27.106.13
38.27.106.12
38.27.106.11
NetRange: 38.0.0.0 - 38.255.255.255
CIDR: 38.0.0.0/8
NetName: COGENT-A
NetHandle: NET-38-0-0-0-1
Parent: ()
NetType: Direct Allocation
OriginAS: AS174
Organization: PSINet, Inc. (PSI)
RegDate: 1991-04-16
Updated: 2011-05-20
Comment: Reassignment information for this block can be found at
Comment: rwhois.cogentco.com 4321
Ref: https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-38-0-0-0-1
There's not much to be found by PSINet or Cogent who own them, but they don't seem to offer hosting services. The only relevant piece of information that I could find as to what PSINet do these days is this one:https://forums.digitalpoint.com/threads/lots-of-weird-traffi...
It does make it sound as if it is a market test, or that PSINet have developed large scale hosting capabilities in the last few years.
// Edit
In addition, they use the exact same terminology Amazon uses in their console file, including ARN and two policies named after S3:
AmazonS3FullAccess AmazonS3ReadOnlyAccess
The policy syntax looks familiar to those coming from S3 as well.
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
The benefit of S3 is that traffic is free within the same region. If you're hosting on AWS that alone is going to save you money versus the competitors.
A less seen cost is for the various operations. Regularly pushing lots of small files on S3 can get expensive. $1/200k files ($0.005 per 1k PUT requests).
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#108Wouldn't it be funny if this was just a market test/exercise, using actual S3 as a backend, just to see if it gets any traction before building own HW/SW solution?
Their IP addresses belong to a company named PSI net: ~ dig +short console.wasabisys.com 38.27.106.13 38.27.106.12 38.27.106.11 NetRange: 38.0.0.0 - 38.255.255.255 CIDR: 38.0.0.0/8 NetName: COGENT-A NetHandle: NET-38-0-0-0-1 Parent: () NetType: Direct Allocation OriginAS: AS174 Organization: PSINet, Inc. (PSI) RegDate: 1991-04-16 Updated: 2011-05-20 Comment: Reassignment information for this block can be found at Com…
Cogent has large scale hosting capability
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#109Lacking comparison with their closest competitor B2 ($0.005/GB, cheaper outbound at $0.02/GB). Also no information on DC location and zones.
Re: Wasabi – Simple storage solution
#110On the same page on HN there's another Wasabi that's a fire alarm for deaf people.
And I'm old enough to remember Wasabi as the proprietary vb-to-php compiler that FogCreek developed for a few years. And I think there was something related to OpenBSD or NetBSD, some company called Wasabi System...? It's definitely one of the most common codenames in IT, together with Phoenix, Firebird and Panda (and in the enterprise, all greek/roman gods).
[0] http://www.wasabisystems.com/
[1] http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?wapbl++NetBSD-current