Live data from Hacker News

Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

github.com

11–20 of 58 posts

Re: Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

#12
post #3

I like that it has the syntex support which seem to fix some of Markdown faults related to HTML

Your comment intrigued me because I've never heard of syntex. I must say, it's hard to find. Not only is Syntex apparently a commonly used company name, but .stx is already used by another markup language, "structured text".

The sheer number of lightweight markup languages is truly amazing.

Re: Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

#15
post #7

mysite/ site.py # site configuration file ext/ # extensions directory for plugins inc/ # includes directory for menus, etc. lib/ # library directory for themes out/ # output directory for html files res/ # resources directory for static assets src/ # source directory for text files Isn't this way too messy? What are the advantages of this over the other 1000000 static site generators?

On the contrary, it appears hyper-organized.

not properly hyper-organized == messy

Re: Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

#16
This is public domain, which is very generous, but apparently problematic. E.g. see comments here https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/opinion/geek-of-the-wee...:

"If I had known as much about copyright in 2001 as I know now, I probably would have gone with something like the Apache license. Live and learn…"

Re: Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

#19

This is public domain, which is very generous, but apparently problematic. E.g. see comments here https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/opinion/geek-of-the-wee... : "If I had known as much about copyright in 2001 as I know now, I probably would have gone with something like the Apache license. Live and learn…"

They put the interview in a table? Ewww. :(

Re: Ivy: a minimalist static site generator in Python

#20
post #19

This is public domain, which is very generous, but apparently problematic. E.g. see comments here https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/opinion/geek-of-the-wee... : "If I had known as much about copyright in 2001 as I know now, I probably would have gone with something like the Apache license. Live and learn…"

They put the interview in a table? Ewww. :(

Tables are good for tabular data. I'd argue that it's potentially arguable that this may actually be tabular data. Either way, now that you mentioned it, I don't know whether my knee-jerk reaction would have been that it's good or bad, or if I'd even notice it at all, heh.
Post reply on HN