Live data from Hacker News

I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

indiehackers.com

11–20 of 83 posts

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#11
post #4

I feel like starting a business with a massive theft of other people's intellectual property isn't a great model to follow.

It sounds like all the competitors were in the same boat at the time. Likely the issue is that no one had a license to the lyrics and the ever slow to catch up record labels weren't doing it either. So it created this space that asked for filling, even if illegally.

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#13

I'd be curious to see some month to month (or year to year) financial charts.

It's actually pretty aligned with the traffic graph shown.

Exceptions are months (e.g. around Christmas) where my advertising partner would be able to attract up to 3x revenue from the same amount of traffic as the month before.

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#14
post #4

I feel like starting a business with a massive theft of other people's intellectual property isn't a great model to follow.

>I feel like starting a business with a massive theft of other people's intellectual property isn't a great model to follow.

This is the basis of essentially every single huge successful consumer application/website over the past decade. There's really only 3 ways to make money on the internet it seems. IP theft, advertisement, and selling physical goods.

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#15
post #4

I feel like starting a business with a massive theft of other people's intellectual property isn't a great model to follow.

Serious question: is this theft of IP? I know if a songwriter writes a song, you need to license it in order to perform it for profit, but are the actual lyrics intellectual property?

Excerpt from https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ50.pdf :

"The copyright law of the United States provides for copyright protection in “musical works, including any accompanying words,” that are fixed in some tangible medium of expression. 17 U.S.C. §102(a)(2). Musical works include both original compositions and original arrangements or other new versions of earlier compositions to which new copyrightable authorship has been added.

"The owner of copyright in a work has the exclusive right to make copies, to prepare derivative works, to sell or distribute copies, and to perform the work publicly. Anyone else wishing to use the work in these ways must have the permission of the author or someone who has derived rights through the author. note: Copyright in a musical work includes the right to make and distribute the first sound recording. Although others are permitted to make subsequent sound recordings, they must compensate the copyright owner of the musical work under the compulsory licensing provision of the law (17 U.S.C. §115). For more information, see Circular 73, Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Phonorecords.

"Copyright Protection Is Automatic

"Under the present copyright law, which became effective January 1, 1978, a work is automatically protected by copyright when it is created. A work is created when it is “fixed” or embodied in a copy or phonorecord for the first time. Neither registration in the Copyright Office nor publication is required for copyright protection under the law.

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#16

Hi, OP here. Happy to answer any specific question...

Why does https://www.directlyrics.com have a TITLE of "Azlyrics" and an H1 of "Azlyrics" but http://www.azlyrics.com seems to be an entirely unrelated web site? The latter is typically what I end up at when I search for song lyrics if I click one of the first few links (though if I want to read some amusing analysis, usually there is a Genius.com link a few below).

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#17
post #4

I feel like starting a business with a massive theft of other people's intellectual property isn't a great model to follow.

Well back in 2004 there was no way to get an actual license. Most lyrics sites claimed to be safe under DMCA or "Educational Use". Only up until the publishers stood up for themselves, the industry shifted slowly.

Re: I’ve supported myself for the past decade with my side project

#20

Hi, OP here. Happy to answer any specific question...

Why does https://www.directlyrics.com have a TITLE of "Azlyrics" and an H1 of "Azlyrics" but http://www.azlyrics.com seems to be an entirely unrelated web site? The latter is typically what I end up at when I search for song lyrics if I click one of the first few links (though if I want to read some amusing analysis, usually there is a Genius.com link a few below).

Yes, good eye. A great example of continuious testing SEO opportunities.

What if Google would start ranking directlyrics on specific 'azlyrics' queries? I haven't seen it happen yet, but if it worked... expect it to be reverted next week.

Post reply on HN