Earlier quoted context omitted.
On the flip side, if we have a problem with racism now just on the basis of skin color/ethnicity/(culture), just imagine what sort of conflicts would arise once there are actual different human races. Even more so if they cannot reproduce with one another.
Life, uh, finds a way.
First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
91–100 of 292 posts
Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#92Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#93here's a TODO list i made for possibly interesting genome editing targets: http://diyhpl.us/wiki/genetic-modifications/ Many of these have low demonstrated correlation or significance so don't just blindly load everything on that document into your at-home CRISPR kit http://www.the-odin.com/gene-engineering-kits/ but it should be a good starting point for thinking about what can be modified, improved, disimproved, et…
Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#94Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#95Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
But in that sense it's not literal at all. Again, chemotherapy.
And surgery, and injections, and stitching wounds, etc. Obviously it's net harm, not no harm at all.
Medical ethics is its own field precisely because overeager and overconfident solutions are fraught with problems.
Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#97here's a TODO list i made for possibly interesting genome editing targets: http://diyhpl.us/wiki/genetic-modifications/ Many of these have low demonstrated correlation or significance so don't just blindly load everything on that document into your at-home CRISPR kit http://www.the-odin.com/gene-engineering-kits/ but it should be a good starting point for thinking about what can be modified, improved, disimproved, et…
Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#98I realize that scientific consensus is that gene editing should not be permitted to enhance human performance - be it mental or physical. But if one nation ignores this consensus, and starts producing "super humans" wouldn't other nations be compelled to follow? Otherwise, over time, wouldn't their citizens, and their nation, slowly fall behind as a country of power and status? Just a thought.
Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#99Re: First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
#100I realize that scientific consensus is that gene editing should not be permitted to enhance human performance - be it mental or physical. But if one nation ignores this consensus, and starts producing "super humans" wouldn't other nations be compelled to follow? Otherwise, over time, wouldn't their citizens, and their nation, slowly fall behind as a country of power and status? Just a thought.
Forget racism, what happens when a country can actually make it's people "better" (faster/smarter/live longer/stronger) by significant margins?