Live data from Hacker News

The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

lil.law.harvard.edu

131–140 of 167 posts

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#131

The article seems to be suggesting that the Million Dollar Home Page has in some sense failed to fulfill it's promise because many of the links are now dead. I don't follow that logic at all. To me it seems that the MDHP's job was to be an iconic piece of internet history, and they've entirely fulfilled their end of the bargain.

One way to look at it is emphasizing the power of link rot. These links typically cost dozens or hundreds of dollars to put in a single link in the MDH, up to the max of $37k; the linkers were motivated and knew that much of the value was in having a valid link to click on. But barely a decade on, even this isn't enough for a majority of links to still work. Interests are too ephemeral, people move on too much, control of domains and hosting are too hard to maintain, even when you are paying thousands of dollars. Linkrot is inevitable.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#133
As good a time as any to trot out my hobby horse with suggestions on how to mitigate data rot. Aimed at science, but more broadly applicable.

"Identifiers for the 21st century" https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414

note/claimer/disclaimer: Although I am included as an author I do not write that well.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#134

I think in many ways it is not a 'decaying digital artifact' as it is an excellent representation of the fallacy upon which a lot of the Internet hangs. In the Library of Alexandria you didn't have scrolls disappear because the kingdom where they originated had been crushed under the boot of an invader. But the Internet is no great library, no respository of knowledge, or an oasis of independent thought. The Internet…

[deleted]

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember that time - there were even people trying to sell guides purporting to teach people how to set up their own million-dollar homepage!

s/million-dollar homepage/altcoin/g

> Any successful thing on the internet that hits the media will sooner or later be copied (usually sooner)

Definitely not copied from anotheer commenter ;)

I keep a list of things that follow this pattern, and yeah, altcoins/tokens are another. It really just becomes a catalogue of what's been popular/happening these past couple decades.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Old buildings stand until they decay or we run out of space nearby and demolish them. HTML doesn't decay and we can't run out of URLs; web pages only disappear because our hosting infrastructure needlessly demands ongoing payment from (only!) the author. I say "needlessly" because the actual cost of storage, CPU, and networks are dropping so quickly that hosting a page forever should asymptotically approach a fixed c…

This really bothers me about the state of webhosting. Trying to host your own stuff always feels so ephemeral because of monthly payment schemes and the need for maintenance. But the alternative of ad supported services like Facebook are fundamentally anti-user and evil by nature. Im really wishing for one of the big cloud providers to offer a one time payment guarenteed for life "digital locker". A single e2e encryp…

Yes! One time payment for life storage is a great idea. I would also want to be able to serve some content publicly for ~100 years, so that it would be accessible even after my death. I called it the 'Century Archive' and wanted to price forever storage at $1/MB (for design as well as economic reasons).

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#137

I actually purchased a $300 spot on this. I did get quite a few clicks, but very low-quality traffic. Mostly, I got lots of offers from copycat sites to join their "billion dollar" homepage or whatnot. It's crazy how many copycats came out, very unoriginal thinking going on.

I too bought, about $800, at the bottom right, to place the words "Million Dollar Script". The script cost $50 a pop, and allowed you to make a self-hosted copycat site. I was quite busy for the next few months as orders kept rushing in! I've also had a few competitors pop up & the script was pirated, including some selling it on ebay, they even forgot to remove my contact email, so their customers were coming to me…

How much sales did you have ultimately? Over $10k?

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#138

FWIW, I'm building https://PageDash.com as a private web archive to address the problem of link rot, beginning from a personal level. Launching in late August. Think of it as a private version of perma.cc.

lol, you found your domain on impossibility, didn't you.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#139
post #2

The Million Dollar Homepage is not decaying (it is still serving its million dollar purpose) - it is the Web itself that has decayed. The brittleness of URIs is on full display. "Cool URLs don't change," but most of these URLs were never cool: they had to rent coolness from Internet cool kid Alex Tew.

>they had to rent coolness from Internet cool kid Alex Tew.

They drank the Cool-Aid, so to speak.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#140

I just heard about the "Million Dollar Homepage" for the first time last week. Would this idea (or one like it) work today? Making a million dollars for something so bizarre, fun, and straightforward sounds amazing. Can anyone reference other attempts at similar ideas?

BitCoin, where the inventor managed to convince people to accept a new currency, mined the first few blocks of it, and ended up with a billion dollars in paper wealth as a result.

By that logic all fiat currencies and even some commodities like diamond and gold(whose usefulness from an industrial perspective doesn't match their market value) would fit the bill.
Post reply on HN