> Type Continue to go to example.com User types "continue"
Google launches new security features to protect users from unverified apps
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: Google launches new security features to protect users from unverified apps
#62I just can't shrug off the thought that manual review approach is a lost game in the long run. It's a process than requires skilled human and can't be fully automated while generating malicious code perfectly can.
They already do manual review for many of their high-serving ads, and people shouldn't shy away from some human intervention in these processes. AI and machine learning are most effective these days when they help assist people (flagging potentially malicious code, bubbling up anomalies, etc.), and it isn't that expensive to get a pair of eyeballs to double check conclusions!
Re: Google launches new security features to protect users from unverified apps
#63Re: Google launches new security features to protect users from unverified apps
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also worth noting that this likely would stop phishing attacks like the one that happened earlier this year. https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/3/15534768/google-docs-phish... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14258918
I reported a bug to Google just a couple of days, which is very similar to this. It allows an attack to present a user with a real Google 'account select' page with their account listed, but if they click that link it actually redirects them to another site (which you can dress up to look like the password page the user is expecting). It is arguably worse than the previous issue, as I don't need a hoax extension, I c…
Re: Google launches new security features to protect users from unverified apps
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
I reported a bug to Google just a couple of days, which is very similar to this. It allows an attack to present a user with a real Google 'account select' page with their account listed, but if they click that link it actually redirects them to another site (which you can dress up to look like the password page the user is expecting). It is arguably worse than the previous issue, as I don't need a hoax extension, I c…
I'm not sure it's worse, since it requires users to type their password into a non- google.com domain. Whereas the oauth phishing, everything was on google.com so it looked legit.