Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency Without Your Landlord Noticing

medium.com

91–100 of 192 posts

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#91
post #13
post #8

Cool! The one thing I notice the author gets wrong is (out of modesty perhaps) claiming the system isn't very financially successful. But it actually is! > 200W system payback period: $300 / $48 = 6.5 years until payback > Either way you cut it, this is not a money saving machine. Energy prices are just too low. That represents like a 16% rate of return with little risk, which any investor would take in a second. How…

You can also get cheaper batteries and larger panels off Craigslist for much less. You can easily find much larger panels for around $100.00 - same kind you see on roofs. Batteries are more difficult to find cheap, but 6 volt golf cart batteries are readily available and low cost. Sometimes you can also find the 12V 35 AH wheelchair batteries (same as what the author used) cheaply too. Point being, if you look around…

Very good point! Hadn't thought of second-hand components. That'd help with the environmental footprint, too!

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're going to break the law, isn't it easier to just tamper with the electric meter or run an extension cord to your next door neighbor's outlet?

Not if you want to avoid stealing.

Using means not permitted by the law and your contract with the service provider to (attempt to, at any rate) reduce your utility bill would seem to be stealing.

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#93
post #75

I work in solar, and your panel really, really, REALLY needs to be secured from wind. Luckily, they make ballast mounts that don't require screwing into the roof[1][2]. [1]: http://www.orionsolarracking.com/commercial-roof-mount/balla... [2]: https://www.civicsolar.com/products/racking-mounting/applica...

Got it! Thanks for the input. Damn that drives up cost, though. I'll work on securing it with weights and post an update.

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#95

> Renters don’t need permission from their landlords to place things on their windowsill and rooftops if it’s not altering the building This has never been the case in any apartment community I've lived in, ever. Every time I've looked into anything like this, the lease says I have to follow community rules, and those rules include stuff like pool hours and parking but also say I can't put foil in my windows, have a…

Good point. I'll clean up the language there. I've never lived in a non-ac unit and non-satellite dish place, but I probably have friends who do. How to work around that then? You could only use an ESCO (energy service company) on the east coast or cleanpowerSF for those scenarios.

> I'll clean up the language there. I've never lived in a non-ac unit and non-satellite dish place

Well, satellite dishes are legally protected by an FCC order, but that doesn't apply to other things.

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#96
post #63
post #54

Please bolt the panel down, if wind picks it up and blows it off the roof it could easily kill someone.

I really doubt the wind is going to pick up a 2'x4' ~20lb panel like that when it's flat on a roof. Now if he had lifted an edge to try and get a better angle with the sun that would IMO be a much larger issue.

Coastal city, flat panel on a roof.

That's a when not if scenario waiting to happen.

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#97
post #63
post #54

Please bolt the panel down, if wind picks it up and blows it off the roof it could easily kill someone.

I really doubt the wind is going to pick up a 2'x4' ~20lb panel like that when it's flat on a roof. Now if he had lifted an edge to try and get a better angle with the sun that would IMO be a much larger issue.

Mother Nature is stronger than you think: http://i.imgur.com/3fqbBgY.gifv

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#98

Will the landlord notice? Maybe not. Will the wife notice all the wires all over the place? You bet!

Because men love electronics projects and women love keeping a tidy house and ruining their dreams, am I right?

Re: Show HN: $200 Solar Self-Sufficiency  Without Your Landlord Noticing

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you might mean solenoid?? It's controlled by the ignition. When the key is on / car running both batteries are in parallel. When the ignition is cut, the solenoid isolates a few circuits that are wired on the backup battery side of the solenoid. This is what I have in my vanagon. I run the radio, fridge, interior lights and some 12v / USB outlets. http://www.gowesty.com/product-details.php?id=2418

Both no doubt exist. A diode would let the secondary battery charge, but never let the engine draw on it; a solenoid-driven contactor would let the engine both charge and draw on the secondary battery, but only when the engine is running. Combining both might not be the world's worst idea, depending on the design purpose. The diode alone would allow the secondary system to draw from the primary battery, potentially d…

The devices used in better RVs are a solenoid which combines the batteries but only when the vehicle battery is above a certain voltage, typically set for a mostly full battery with surplus alternator energy available.

This avoids the voltage drop of the diode which confuses the charging situation for the house battery. It is also save the 2-5% power loss and heat dissipation on a diode.

As a bonus, you get a switch to manually engage the solenoid for engine starting when the vehicular battery is weak.

Post reply on HN