Was disappointed because title is misleading; I had hoped the fund was using actual Algae (i.e. computation in biological medium) to produce market decisions. Instead it is just biologists that are creating algos with their existing machine-learning knowledge. Apparently deep-learning and algae are the same thing.
My first thought was that they ask algae for stock tips like the magic conch shell of Spongebob :( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lu5SJcNp0J0
Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
101–110 of 123 posts
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#102Was disappointed because title is misleading; I had hoped the fund was using actual Algae (i.e. computation in biological medium) to produce market decisions. Instead it is just biologists that are creating algos with their existing machine-learning knowledge. Apparently deep-learning and algae are the same thing.
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#103They are overthinking this... with sufficiently low latency to your exchange, all your "quant"(and I use this term loosely) needs to do is watch the order book. When either side's inside bid/ask is about to crack, you join the opposing side with a market order, and place a stop on the next tick in your direction. This is what 99.99% of consistently profitable quants do. It's boring, unexciting, and VERY profitable. T…
> said Lun, whose computer holds trades for an average of six days
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#104Was disappointed because title is misleading; I had hoped the fund was using actual Algae (i.e. computation in biological medium) to produce market decisions. Instead it is just biologists that are creating algos with their existing machine-learning knowledge. Apparently deep-learning and algae are the same thing.
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#105They are overthinking this... with sufficiently low latency to your exchange, all your "quant"(and I use this term loosely) needs to do is watch the order book. When either side's inside bid/ask is about to crack, you join the opposing side with a market order, and place a stop on the next tick in your direction. This is what 99.99% of consistently profitable quants do. It's boring, unexciting, and VERY profitable. T…
This is entirely incorrect. Quants do not, as a rule, run liquidity providing strategies with market orders. Market orders pay for liquidity; they are the buyers for what HFT is selling.
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#106They are overthinking this... with sufficiently low latency to your exchange, all your "quant"(and I use this term loosely) needs to do is watch the order book. When either side's inside bid/ask is about to crack, you join the opposing side with a market order, and place a stop on the next tick in your direction. This is what 99.99% of consistently profitable quants do. It's boring, unexciting, and VERY profitable. T…
I agree with your general assessment of HFT, but if the article is correct, this fund doesn't fit that mold: > said Lun, whose computer holds trades for an average of six days
Does this exclude outliers? What's the median duration?
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#107Question for investing people.. say I started a hedge fund, put all the money in vanguard to achieve s&p500 benchmark return, then once a year did an options bet with a roughly 97 percent chance of a 3 percent return and a 3 percent chance of ruin. I do this for 10 years, outperformng the s&p 500 by 3 percent consistently. I have 70 percent odds of not being ruined, and I consistent outperform most hedge funds. I hav…
It's a good strategy, if you can afford not to withdraw from the fund on the year (and for several years after) you 97% bet turns sour - there was an article somewhere, which showed that options on S&P singe the great depression almost a hundred years ago, would have only slightly outperformed the index, due to losing in the bear market.
If the bet turns sour, you close the fund. The idea is that you grow the fund and take your two and twenty while your bets are winning, and you keep your prior years' two and twenty after your fund collapses.
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hah, that's excellent! I'd never heard of that specific trick, but survivor bias does seem like one of the best ways to fool scam-aware people into trusting you.
I had a b-school class do a similar exercise, in the context of the debate between passively and actively managed funds. Everyone in the class was asked to stand up, pull out a coin and flip it. If you flipped tails you sat down. Then the remaining students flipped again, repeating until there was only one person left standing. At which point the professor "interviewed" the student, asking what her method was and how…
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had a b-school class do a similar exercise, in the context of the debate between passively and actively managed funds. Everyone in the class was asked to stand up, pull out a coin and flip it. If you flipped tails you sat down. Then the remaining students flipped again, repeating until there was only one person left standing. At which point the professor "interviewed" the student, asking what her method was and how…
I like this. Unfortunately today, you'd be unlikely to find students with coins!
Re: Hedge Fund Uses Algae to Reap 21% Return
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree with your general assessment of HFT, but if the article is correct, this fund doesn't fit that mold: > said Lun, whose computer holds trades for an average of six days
> an average of Does this exclude outliers? What's the median duration?