Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

metafluff.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 563 posts

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#21

Post by kbrosnan »

elfchief wrote: post #13

Wow. I've been getting more and more frustrated with how poorly Chrome handles even a moderately large number of tabs (~150), and it sounds like my savior is going to be ... Firefox. Huh. Wouldn't have guessed it, but I'll totally take it. I have a nice extension for Chrome called Quick Tabs that gives me a searchable list of my open tabs and makes it easy to find things I have open... anyone know which of the severa…

"% foo" will search your open tabs for foo. See https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/awesome-bar-search-fire... for other characters that will filter the search results for other data such as bookmarks, history, tags, etc.

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#22

Post by sillysaurus3 »

elfchief wrote: post #13

Wow. I've been getting more and more frustrated with how poorly Chrome handles even a moderately large number of tabs (~150), and it sounds like my savior is going to be ... Firefox. Huh. Wouldn't have guessed it, but I'll totally take it. I have a nice extension for Chrome called Quick Tabs that gives me a searchable list of my open tabs and makes it easy to find things I have open... anyone know which of the severa…

It's unfortunate because back in ~2010 I used to open over 1,000 tabs in Chrome at a time. It's very useful when doing research: each window represents a topic, and each topic can spawn 30+ tabs.

Nowadays Chrome keels over at around 150, like you say. It also leaks memory like a sieve, so if your hard drive is anywhere close to full you'll end up with a lovely OS X popup saying all your running programs have been frozen and that your system is out of memory (since it can't page to disk because it's full).

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#23

Post by KZeillmann »

elfchief wrote: post #13

Wow. I've been getting more and more frustrated with how poorly Chrome handles even a moderately large number of tabs (~150), and it sounds like my savior is going to be ... Firefox. Huh. Wouldn't have guessed it, but I'll totally take it. I have a nice extension for Chrome called Quick Tabs that gives me a searchable list of my open tabs and makes it easy to find things I have open... anyone know which of the severa…

Out of curiosity, and because the article doesn't delve into it, why do you have 150 tabs open?

In the course of my regular browsing, I usually have 3-4, and never more than 10-15. It's not something I've ever considered to have that many tabs open

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#25

Post by zzalpha »

elfchief wrote: post #13

Wow. I've been getting more and more frustrated with how poorly Chrome handles even a moderately large number of tabs (~150), and it sounds like my savior is going to be ... Firefox. Huh. Wouldn't have guessed it, but I'll totally take it. I have a nice extension for Chrome called Quick Tabs that gives me a searchable list of my open tabs and makes it easy to find things I have open... anyone know which of the severa…

Not to at all dispute your use case/requirements or anything, but as a depth-first browser user, I can't even fathom a world in which 150 tabs qualifies as "moderately" large, and not "how many tabs???" large. And 1000+ (as cited by a sibling poster)? Wow!

I wonder if this "I want to read this but I'll set it aside for now" model of browsing might be better served with a different UI metaphor...

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#26

Post by ehsanu1 »

revelation wrote: post #16

Whut? It didn't get any faster, it's just more aggressively lazy loaded now. This is breaking the very use case of people who have 100+ tabs; they want stuff to be there when they click on it.

As a many tabs user, I don't agree. The use case is more like a more visible bookmark, with history. Any tabs commonly used will already be loaded, and it is fine to lazy load tabs that are rarely used but kept open as reminders. It's definitely a much better experience than waiting 5 minutes after startup for the CPU activity to die down.

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#27

Post by canuckistani »

aboodman wrote: post #19

Why do you have a profile w/ 1600 tabs in it. If whatever it is is so important, aren't you afraid to lose it? I'd be terrified that one time Firefox just wouldn't shut down clean.

This isn't his main profile ( well I hope not any way ), it's a profile used to test extreme startup performance issues.

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#29

Post by lucb1e »

kevin_thibedeau wrote: post #6
rc_kas wrote: post #3

I <3 you Firefox. I'm so sad that nobody uses you.

Hard to love when the broken extension ecosystem prevents the use of vertical tabs for these scenarios.

I've got vertical tabs from Test Pilot for months now and I'll never turn back. Not sure what you're talking about.

Re: The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs

#30

Post by adrianmonk »

aboodman wrote: post #19

Why do you have a profile w/ 1600 tabs in it. If whatever it is is so important, aren't you afraid to lose it? I'd be terrified that one time Firefox just wouldn't shut down clean.

I feel like preserving open tabs across a crash is not that hard from a technical point of view. The thing I'd be afraid of is more that something would decide (for me) that I don't want to preserve tabs.
Post reply on HN