Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Seattle experiment would have to be repeated for higher levels of minimum wage. I would suggest a basic income instead though, then people won't have to pick fruit to survive :)
Paying the top 1/2 of earners a basic income is hyper regressive and inefficient (you have to turn around and tax it back from them). The current progressive income tax system paired with a higher income tax credit - instead of a counter productive higher minimum wage - is a vastly superior approach that has already been proven to work very well. BI is a fantasy at best. At worst, it'll wreck any economy that attempt…
I'd also like to see actual evidence that BI cant work out financially. You get X tax dollars out of your economy, you Pay out X/population to each person. How does that not work out?