Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do believe they are trying to do something, but it has more to do with marketing and product placement than with design. Lastly, we did our best to follow the “less but better” teachings of 1960’s Braun designs. These enduring designs are known for their stripped down features and clean lines. No unnecessary buttons or extraneous curves, just what you need; everything in its place. It's a bottle. There's no need to…
This is silly. Your argument is still "It's a bottle therefor stop making a big deal about it" - it's someone's job to care about it. They explain the problem they set out to solve, how they solved it, a background to how these problems are solved (I don't know shit about design, so the "less but better" reference is actually interesting). If you want to say "It's marketing" no shit, anything any company publishes en…
Designing a Bottle
131–140 of 151 posts
Re: Designing a Bottle
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is silly. Your argument is still "It's a bottle therefor stop making a big deal about it" - it's someone's job to care about it. They explain the problem they set out to solve, how they solved it, a background to how these problems are solved (I don't know shit about design, so the "less but better" reference is actually interesting). If you want to say "It's marketing" no shit, anything any company publishes en…
It's more about being pretentious. If you show me a nice program you coded, I'd say "that's cool". If you show me a nice program you coded and tell me that you've been inspired by John Backus, Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, I'd say "yeah well it's still a program".
The "program" here being one of the simplest imaginable, with literally thousands of years of prior art.
Re: Designing a Bottle
#133Inacceptable! Unfortunately "designers" nowadays feel more like self-loving "artists" rather than problem-solving engineers - we need better education! "Inventing a plastic bottle in 2017" - this could be joke, but the ignorance behind it makes me angry. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782/tab-pdf http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768 http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/4/140…
Re: Designing a Bottle
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is silly. Your argument is still "It's a bottle therefor stop making a big deal about it" - it's someone's job to care about it. They explain the problem they set out to solve, how they solved it, a background to how these problems are solved (I don't know shit about design, so the "less but better" reference is actually interesting). If you want to say "It's marketing" no shit, anything any company publishes en…
It's more about being pretentious. If you show me a nice program you coded, I'd say "that's cool". If you show me a nice program you coded and tell me that you've been inspired by John Backus, Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, I'd say "yeah well it's still a program".
Re: Designing a Bottle
#135This is a nice blog post - what's with all the hate? So it's basically a marketing tool, but isn't that what blogs are for? As a customer of Soylent, I appreciate that they are writing blog posts about their thought process. It feels nice to be communicated with. Also, I highly doubt a detailed blog post like this is going to convert many new customers - seems like it's mainly for existing ones. FYI, the new bottles…
Something about online communications seems to make some people particularly irritable. Perhaps it's the
immediacy and semi-anonymity of it all. Whatever it is, there are whole classes of people you will soon
think seem to exist to make you miserable.
Rather than pausing and reflecting on a message as one might do with a letter received on paper, it's
just so easy to hit your R key and tell somebody you don't really know what you really think of them.
Even otherwise calm people sometimes find themselves turning into raving madmen. When this happens,
flames erupt.
And of course, Usenet was around long before this book was published. So now, when I see people being righteously indignant on HN or Reddit, I try to take it in stride. They're just carrying on the time honored internet flaming tradition. :)[1] https://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/bdgtti/bdgtti_8.html
Re: Designing a Bottle
#136Surely a product's design is meant to give some indication of what is in the product and what the product does?
This just looks like a completely generic bottle and could as easily be for a foodstuff or a cleaning agent.
I saw something similar the other day, a 'brandless' supermarket where everything is designed in a similarly minimalist way. It's infuriating.
http://designtaxi.com/news/394281/A-Fabulous-Brandless-Onlin...
Re: Designing a Bottle
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
A keurig type machine for soylent paper bags would be an interesting sight. Now I wonder how keurig even began convincing people to use their unconventional methods for coffee.
I don't know how difficult it is to mix Soylent, but you can buy an automatic baby formula maker for $150-$200. Put water in the tank, power in the top, and boom: automatic mixing. I'm surprised an enterprising Soylent enthusiast hasn't hacked something up yet—particularly given their "early adopter" tech audience. It shouldn't be too much harder to add "pods" (powder containers) to that device. It might even make th…
Re: Designing a Bottle
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
A keurig type machine for soylent paper bags would be an interesting sight. Now I wonder how keurig even began convincing people to use their unconventional methods for coffee.
> Now I wonder how keurig even began convincing people to use their unconventional methods for coffee. It's a simple, self-contained way to freshly and quickly brew a single cup of coffee with no mess, and priced for consumers: Cutting a few annoying chores out of a rushed morning at a cost of a few tens of cents per cup. In what world was that ever a hard sell?
Re: Designing a Bottle
#139Re: Designing a Bottle
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Now I wonder how keurig even began convincing people to use their unconventional methods for coffee. It's a simple, self-contained way to freshly and quickly brew a single cup of coffee with no mess, and priced for consumers: Cutting a few annoying chores out of a rushed morning at a cost of a few tens of cents per cup. In what world was that ever a hard sell?
One with coffee filters