I wonder if they improved Cluster setup with this release. If you tried without DC/OS, it was painful experience. Arangodb Starter was definitely a step in right direction.
ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
11–20 of 32 posts
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#12I wonder if they improved Cluster setup with this release. If you tried without DC/OS, it was painful experience. Arangodb Starter was definitely a step in right direction.
https://www.arangodb.com/fault-tolerant-foxx/
Although it showcases fault-tolerance in Foxx specifically, it's really a demo of setting up a cluster with Arango Starter and we wouldn't have been to make Foxx so resilient in 3.2 without the hard work of the cluster team providing the stability underneath.
Disclosure: I'm a core contributor for ArangoDB Foxx.
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#13Congratulations to the ArangoDB team ! With ArangoDB you can create powerful applications using a multi models database and an API builder called Foxx. I'm building all my apps now within ArangoDB/Foxx no more needs of server apps.
Thank you! One thing the article actually forgets to mention is that 3.2.0 also is the official release for the new HTTP API for managing Foxx services: https://docs.arangodb.com/3.2/HTTP/Foxx/Management.html We're hoping to backport most of it to 3.1 and already support it in the latest release of the JavaScript driver. This should make automated deployments considerably easier. You can literally install, configure…
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#14I wonder if they improved Cluster setup with this release. If you tried without DC/OS, it was painful experience. Arangodb Starter was definitely a step in right direction.
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you! One thing the article actually forgets to mention is that 3.2.0 also is the official release for the new HTTP API for managing Foxx services: https://docs.arangodb.com/3.2/HTTP/Foxx/Management.html We're hoping to backport most of it to 3.1 and already support it in the latest release of the JavaScript driver. This should make automated deployments considerably easier. You can literally install, configure…
Semi-related to Foxx, is it now possible to add/remove coordinators dynamically to cluster? In other words, can we now scale out Foxx services easily if load increases?
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#16Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#17I wonder if they improved Cluster setup with this release. If you tried without DC/OS, it was painful experience. Arangodb Starter was definitely a step in right direction.
Have you had a look at the fault-tolerant Foxx demo? https://www.arangodb.com/fault-tolerant-foxx/ Although it showcases fault-tolerance in Foxx specifically, it's really a demo of setting up a cluster with Arango Starter and we wouldn't have been to make Foxx so resilient in 3.2 without the hard work of the cluster team providing the stability underneath. Disclosure: I'm a core contributor for ArangoDB Foxx.
FYI, a minor copy edit suggestion: "HIPPA", should be "HIPAA".
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_a...
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you! One thing the article actually forgets to mention is that 3.2.0 also is the official release for the new HTTP API for managing Foxx services: https://docs.arangodb.com/3.2/HTTP/Foxx/Management.html We're hoping to backport most of it to 3.1 and already support it in the latest release of the JavaScript driver. This should make automated deployments considerably easier. You can literally install, configure…
Semi-related to Foxx, is it now possible to add/remove coordinators dynamically to cluster? In other words, can we now scale out Foxx services easily if load increases?
Be sure to check out this short demo of the Cluster Starter:
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#19Would like to hear who used it in production and what type of scale that DB is handling.
Re: ArangoDB 3.2 GA RocksDB, Pregel, Fault-Tolerant Foxx and Satellite Collections
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you had a look at the fault-tolerant Foxx demo? https://www.arangodb.com/fault-tolerant-foxx/ Although it showcases fault-tolerance in Foxx specifically, it's really a demo of setting up a cluster with Arango Starter and we wouldn't have been to make Foxx so resilient in 3.2 without the hard work of the cluster team providing the stability underneath. Disclosure: I'm a core contributor for ArangoDB Foxx.
The new release looks packed full of features - especially excited about Keylines and encryption. FYI, a minor copy edit suggestion: "HIPPA", should be "HIPAA". - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_a...
I've forwarded your find to the marketing team.