This would be great for CERN. We do a lot of software development, but most of it is very bespoke, and you are often not going to get an answer on stackoverflow. Also there are confidentially requirements (it would be great if you could tag a post e.g. ATLAS-internal, CMS-internal, and then only people from your experiment could see that post). We probably have tens of thousands of members, so I think we have the cri…
StackOverflow for private teams in beta
31–40 of 64 posts
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#32Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surely the confidentiality would not allow you to upload information to an US company?
Only if it were personal data, while in this case it's mostly experimental data, Monte Carlo simulations, and so on.
The most compelling reason for confidentiality I've heard is that if another experiment sees our work in progress, it would influence them, and the results would no longer be independent. If you go back and look at old measurements, you find that they were often biased towards rumored values or other experiment's measurements.
(There are also less then convincing reasons, many people fear releasing "unfinished" information to the public would make a bad impression and risk funding. I'm personally inclined to let the public see more how the sausage (err, science) is made. People get the wrong impression that we turn on a machine, get the result, and write it down for eternity into a textbook, but in reality it is always a long an iterative process with many mistakes along the way.)
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#34This would be great for CERN. We do a lot of software development, but most of it is very bespoke, and you are often not going to get an answer on stackoverflow. Also there are confidentially requirements (it would be great if you could tag a post e.g. ATLAS-internal, CMS-internal, and then only people from your experiment could see that post). We probably have tens of thousands of members, so I think we have the cri…
Sounds like you guys should check out Stack Overflow Enterprise then! (could host it on-prem) https://www.stackoverflowbusiness.com/enterprise Full disclosure: I'm the PM on both Channels and Enterprise
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#35This would be great for CERN. We do a lot of software development, but most of it is very bespoke, and you are often not going to get an answer on stackoverflow. Also there are confidentially requirements (it would be great if you could tag a post e.g. ATLAS-internal, CMS-internal, and then only people from your experiment could see that post). We probably have tens of thousands of members, so I think we have the cri…
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#36I guess in that situation, our team should just wait until it's out and public. But a lot of these "free betas" go on for months or even years. I know this isn't always the case, but it almost feels like at times, the goal is to get users dependent on the product before telling them how much you're going to take/charge.
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#37I don't know anyone who actually finds the answer via SO search.
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#38This would be great for CERN. We do a lot of software development, but most of it is very bespoke, and you are often not going to get an answer on stackoverflow. Also there are confidentially requirements (it would be great if you could tag a post e.g. ATLAS-internal, CMS-internal, and then only people from your experiment could see that post). We probably have tens of thousands of members, so I think we have the cri…
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#39This could be really useful, however I wonder how teams will find answers to their questions without a private Google channel :) I don't know anyone who actually finds the answer via SO search.
Re: StackOverflow for private teams in beta
#40(which is actually a good thing, I wish there was a hosting service with their combined strengths)