Live data from Hacker News

Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

reuters.com

81–90 of 232 posts

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#81
post #44
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the exact reason why I hate wearing and even worst ever being forced to wear one.

I've never been forced to wear one in my professional life, so I dunno about that. But I'll wear one by choice on occasion. Even when I was working a day job I'd just wear a suit some days. My boss would think I was interviewing (I wasn't, usually), but it's really just because it is an easy, straightforward confidence boost.

Good to keep your boss on his or her toes too

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can either chafe, or acknowledge reality and use it to your advantage. When I was younger, I chafed. Now, I enjoy getting seated at that restaurant table before you.

When everyone is wearing a suit, how does one differentiate?

Watch I guess, Patek trumps Rolex and so on...

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#83
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, one of the things I absolutely love about tech/Silicon Valley is nobody cares at all how you dress. LOL the "hoodie code" is 10x stronger than any suit code.

Honest question: how old are you? If you're even the slightest bit concerned with anything anyone is wearing, then you need to focus on something else.

I'm old enough to not care sometimes and to play the game sometimes and to know the difference

Tell a suit wearer that they should dress casual tomorrow and they'll say OK. Tell a geek they have to wear a suit tomorrow and they'll freak out. Now tell me who cares more about clothes?

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#84
post #81
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never been forced to wear one in my professional life, so I dunno about that. But I'll wear one by choice on occasion. Even when I was working a day job I'd just wear a suit some days. My boss would think I was interviewing (I wasn't, usually), but it's really just because it is an easy, straightforward confidence boost.

Good to keep your boss on his or her toes too

Ehh. Every boss I've ever worked for after my initial out-of-college gig has known that I interview regularly, once every quarter at least; it was never anything personal or because of dissatisfaction, just "I like networking and I like seeing how the trends in the market are evolving". I usually didn't wear a suit to those, though, for the other reason: tech people get weird about well-dressed people and think they're "fakes" or whatever.

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#85
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the exact reason why I hate wearing and even worst ever being forced to wear one.

Not everyone is built for success. At least you recognize that in yourself.

success? what does that even mean?

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#88
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like a black and white picture doesn't really contribute to the conversation. I assume it's meant as a joke but either way, I try to downvote when something doesn't contribute (as opposed to when I don't agree).

Hello? It's not just a black and white picture, it's the 1927 Solvay Conference on Quantum Mechanics, the joke being that most of the "mindless drones in suits" in it won Nobel prizes.

I figured they must be prominent people, but in that picture I don't see much. It won't be pink and purple but I can imagine tints of green and other colors that shake things up a bit.

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#89
post #15

I worked on the American trading floor of a Swiss bank. After the crisis, Zürich decided to reign in us free-wheelers. So they came out with a new dress code [1]: "Among the 'dos' and 'don’ts' for women: 'Make sure to touch up hair regrowth regularly if you color your hair.' Men are commanded to, 'Schedule barber appointments every four weeks to maintain your haircut shape.' Neither sex is allowed to 'allow their und…

Goldman Sachs has always had a ridiculously antiquated dress code for people who will never come within fifty feet of a client. When I was much younger I didn't understand the concept of people who never had to deal with clients having a dress code but now I sorta do: the company is trying to create or promote the concept that everyone in the company is a member of the same team and have more in common with each othe…

It makes sense in the military, since as an institution it requires its individual members to have much less freedom and autonomy.

But if a company needs to use technics from the military, something is wrong. Life is not war.

Re: Goldman Sachs relaxes dress code for techs in fight for talent

#90
post #44
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the exact reason why I hate wearing and even worst ever being forced to wear one.

I've never been forced to wear one in my professional life, so I dunno about that. But I'll wear one by choice on occasion. Even when I was working a day job I'd just wear a suit some days. My boss would think I was interviewing (I wasn't, usually), but it's really just because it is an easy, straightforward confidence boost.

"on occasion" being the keyword. It's good to be able to leverage a suit as a tool or for pleasure. Many people rejecting formal dressing miss that.

But the problem with a very strict dress code is that you don't feel being respected, you feel coerced.

Post reply on HN