Live data from Hacker News

NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on Mars

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 342 posts

Re: NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on Mars

#3
I have been watching this since 2000. New president comes in, scraps old programs, declares new "vision". NASA does a few incoherent things and the whole thing restarts after a few years. It's pretty sad. I wish they would commit to something and actually finish it.

Re: NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on Mars

#4
post #3

I have been watching this since 2000. New president comes in, scraps old programs, declares new "vision". NASA does a few incoherent things and the whole thing restarts after a few years. It's pretty sad. I wish they would commit to something and actually finish it.

NASA programs typically span multiple decades and run in the billions of dollars, The political pendulum sways from one side to the other side every 4-8 years, every new administration is looking for ways to cut down taxes. It's amazing they get anything done imho.

Re: NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on Mars

#7
NASA has enough funding, they are just spending it on SLS and Orion(¹). It appears that if they were to pay the "new space" companies to get them to Mars, the money would be enough.

(¹) because Congress wants them to, because ... jobs (as if "new space" companies weren't creating jobs, too... even competitive ones)

Re: NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on Mars

#10

such a waste of time and (other ppl's) money.

Agreed. There's more important things to spend public money on at the moment (like servicing the $20T in debt). Let private companies, like SpaceX, voluntarily spend R&D on it.
Post reply on HN