Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: We've just launched our bug tracker, Purify - what do you think?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 30 posts

Ask HN: We've just launched our bug tracker, Purify - what do you think?

#1
So we've finally pushed Purify live, and I would be grateful if I could get some feedback.

It's bug and feature tracker with Github integration that has been built for speed.

This isn't a MVP, we've spent a while beta testing and polishing, so we're considering this version to be the first full-on release. We're waiting on our merchant account to be set up, so until then, there are no paid accounts - just the free one.

Constructive criticism gratefully requested :D

http://purifyapp.com

Re: Ask HN: We've just launched our bug tracker, Purify - what do you think?

#6
post #4

What about trademark confusion with this well known tool: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Rational_Purify ?

I agree, Rationals Purify is quite well known. If you weren't playing in the software development space I wouldn't think it was an issue, but in this case I'd consider a rebrand if I was you

Re: Ask HN: We've just launched our bug tracker, Purify - what do you think?

#8
I looked around, but couldn't find an answer to this question: what sets Purify apart from other issue trackers?

* If I know how to use Trac/Redmine, why use Purify?

* Why choose it over other hosted trackers, specifically Lighthouse?

* If I have Github Issues built-in to Github, why would I choose Purify?

Edit: I'm not saying there's no compelling reason to use Purify, I'd just like to hear the team's take.

Post reply on HN