Live data from Hacker News

Photos of Mosul 2017

petapixel.com

31–40 of 136 posts

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#31

Why would no one buy these amazing photographs? Either OP is bad at finding a buyer or photography is one tough job.

Mosul is basically Aleppo done by the good guys, but looking much the same in terms of dead civilians and destroyed buildings. Not as popular a story.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#32
Note: Just to clarify in case anyone misinterprets, these are not my photos! I merely copied the title from the page. If there's a better way to title pages like these, please let me know, since I was confused as to what title I should put while avoiding it being misleading.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#33

Why would no one buy these amazing photographs? Either OP is bad at finding a buyer or photography is one tough job.

I'd guess that there is fatigue or disinterest in the West at continuing to hear/see this sort of story. It doesn't sell so editors run with whatever local non-drama captivates people.

At least it looks like this ploy by the photographer has worked - search his name and loads of online media have published something similar to this link. The idea that people don't care and the media won't pay has made it a story. Good on him for outside the box thinking.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#34
post #29

They're decent pictures, but not "GREAT" pictures. Even in warzones photojournalism is a highly competitive field. Editors at Reuters, AP and other news agencies get tons of sets offered every day. Whining about it in an extremely passive aggressive blog post really isn't going to help his career along.

I'm sorry, but where is the whining? He simply said that no-one would buy his work, and that he felt he owed it to the people who kindly shared some of their lives with him to try and get their story out there. The headline 'no one would buy my photos...' is catchy, truthful, and has obviously been effective at drawing attention.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#35

I suppose you mostly tried US papers? I see a better audience for this in Europe

Apologies for the confusion, this isn't by me -- I was merely sharing the page and wasn't sure what else to title it than what it had originally. I just posted a note to that effect.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#36
post #19

Good shots Kainoa, I really wish I could read the story that goes with them. I can see it being hard as a news photographer of any sort these days, as papers are going through a very hard transition that may see them completely vanish at the other side of it. Have you considered finding some writers on Medium? Their new concept is to be the platform without the paper, readers select writers more organically and write…

Apologies for the confusion, this isn't by me -- I was merely sharing the page and wasn't sure what else to title it than what it had originally. I just posted a note to that effect.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#37

Why would no one buy these amazing photographs? Either OP is bad at finding a buyer or photography is one tough job.

Lots of supply and little demand - doing photography is one thing but selling photography is one tough job.

Journalistic photography is slowly moving away from being a profession towards an expensive hobby where you may sell some pictures sometimes, but not enough to earn a living or even cover the hardware.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#38
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are things that are not supposed to be shown on the traditional media, dead soldiers being the first one that comes to mind. Maybe these pictures go against the prevailing vision the media wants to disseminate.

Tell that to the BBC, ITV, and Sky News here in the UK. They show dead bodies all the time. I find it distasteful. I get it - people died, you don't have to show me their bodies to get your point across.

> I find it distasteful. I get it - people died, you don't have to show me their bodies to get your point across.

For many people seeing photos sends across very different emotions than reading words.

Re: Photos of Mosul 2017

#39
post #12
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What else should we talk about in this thread? About how sad it is that nobody wanted to buy her photos, or about how great it is that she's giving them away?

To be honest, sounds like a plan, because I'd like to know the former and I agree with the latter.

It's just my personal opinion, but I think these photos are poor quality. Many of them were not in focus and post-processing was used to make them look better. And that's based on the really small versions available. So I don't think it's surprising they were not accepted by some newspapers (especially that we don't know the asking price).

Still, it's great that the author decided to share them for free. They have great value even without being top quality - it's just that many publications want to keep the photos quality top notch.

Post reply on HN