Live data from Hacker News

Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

medium.com

321–330 of 352 posts

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are sick days still a thing? At my job we get PTO and holidays (floating depending on the year), but no specific sick days. Apologies for any naivete.

I think sick days are generally a good idea as they encourage people that are sick not to come in, thus helping stem epidemics. If they're regular time off, people come in sick to save them up. You might try to make a distinction between contagious and non-contagious diseases, but it'd probably be unwise as often people don't know if they are contagious or not, and anyway encouraging healing isn't a terrible idea eve…

I found this interesting article that claims that flu days / sick days reduced the number of workplace cases by 6% by reducing the in-workplace transmission rate by 25% for one day and 40% for two days of time off.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130613161831.h...

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds like a really great realization to have had! For the record, what your old manager was doing (directly asking you about your mental health status in a quasi-interview setting) was probably illegal, at least in the US (IANAL). There are pretty strict rules around the kinds of things that employers are allowed to ask prospective employees about, and health (mental or otherwise) is very much on the "not allo…

>health (mental or otherwise) is very much on the "not allowed" list This is a gross oversimplification to the point of being untrue. In addition to what the sibling comment said about asking itself not being illegal, you're allowed to discriminate based on health/disability status all you want if the disability prevents an employee from doing a bona fide job requirement and there isn't any "reasonable accommodation"…

Agreed that it was an oversimplification, and thanks for the additional clarity and info. In the box-lifting example, doesn't that sort of thing usually have to be made very explicit in the requirements job posting?

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> I've never heard of anyone here being asked for a verification, but it would tend to discourage people doing the "sanity day" sort of thing. I suspect that the lack of trust this indicates on the part of the company (not to mention foster on the part of the employee) is probably a sign that you're past the point of no return. I suspect a company that asked for verification was not doing so to see if you were genui…

I've seen people routinely abuse sick days and they considered it normal (they brag about it). Others coincidentally are "sick" for exactly 10 days a year, year after year. They think management doesn't notice, and wonder why they don't get much in the way of raises or promotions. Basically, you're right. The verification thing is invoked to provide convenient evidence to get rid of someone they already want to get r…

What's wrong with people taking 10 days off per year? Why is management so short-sighted as to make promotion decisions based on ~4days/yr of presence (Why does it even matter why they take the time off?

Make a stupid policy, get a rational response from employees.

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#324
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are sick days still a thing? At my job we get PTO and holidays (floating depending on the year), but no specific sick days. Apologies for any naivete.

Technically I think so, but from what I've seen some people use PTO days for sick days (or to go to the doctor)? We have 6 holidays + 1 floating that we can use, and they don't roll over from year to year.

That's even worse than Amazon!

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Are sick days still a thing? Why wouldn't they be? I assume they're mandatory in most countries.

In most (western, don't know otherwise) countries, you stay home when you're sick, and get paid because it's outside of your control. No matter if that is day 1 this year or day 20.

So employers need to be careful not to hire sickly people?

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a counterpoint, there are no objective scientific tests for, say, back pain or neck pain or nausea or menstrual cramps.

That is because pain is not a disease, it is a subjective experience (or symptom) generated by the nervous system.

So? A disease (or injury) is what causes the pain. Why the specious distinction?

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#327

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the difference between being depressed and "feeling" depressed? What is the difference between being schizophrenic and having the "opinion" that Satan speaks to you through your neighbor's cat? Mental illness is defined by what a person feels and believes. What you feel and believe is subjective but you can objectively establish that a particular cluster of subjective feelings and beliefs is abnormal vis-a-vi…

Not what you asked exactly, but response to drugs sometimes leads to an (objective) differential diagnosis: if someone is depressed and flips out in a manic attack when starting antidepressants... that's not Major Depressive, that's Bipolar. How do you objectively verify "manic"? You can track hours slept. No one fakes sleeping two hours a day for a month while having, say, good motor skills in the daytime. This matt…

Is "asking a patient how much they sleep" the same as "watching them to measure how much they sleep"?

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#328

There is a kinda secret code for OOO or WFH emails that managers should respect. Definitely got to "Respect the code" (say in a pirate voice). As a manager I'd write purposely vague emails to contribute to this, "Sorry will be late, got jumped by a gang of ninjas" because I really don't like to set a cultural tone that isn't trusting of employees. I basically need to know you aren't going to be here but I don't need…

Have you tried a policy honesty and discretion?

"OOO/WFH: be back Tuesday at 11am"

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You didn't mention the most obvious solution which is condoms. I bought them easily as a teenager 18 years ago. You can get them for free in many places these days. You're also giving teenagers a pass for having unprotected sex as if they don't know there's a risk of 1) getting pregnant and 2) getting an STD. Certainly some birth control measures are less accessible to teenagers, but what I'm arguing is the parent's…

Without getting into any of the rest of this comment: that's not what you said . You blamed teenaged girls in part for not taking advantage of contraceptive pills. Specifically, you wrote: It's common knowledge how reproduction works. You have condoms, birth control pills and copper rings among other options. That's simply not a reasonable argument. Don't move the goalposts now.

I'm not moving the goalposts. If you're a teenager and you don't use a condom or other means and get pregnant - that's on you. You wrote a long retort which ignored condoms. That's unreasonable.

If you don't use a condom no matter what age you are and get an STD - same thing - that's on you too.

Your argument about post-conception options - I agree that not everyone has the same access. But I'm not talking about that.

Condoms work. Teenagers know the risk. They're just being dumb and it's on them.

Now - your argument that making birth control more available - sure I think that's a good thing too. But the notion that "the vast majority of teenage mothers in the United States do not choose to get pregnant" is irresponsible because almost all of them got pregnant by being wreckless while viable options are readily available. Specifically condoms.

Re: Mental health is still an issue in the workplace

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Without getting into any of the rest of this comment: that's not what you said . You blamed teenaged girls in part for not taking advantage of contraceptive pills. Specifically, you wrote: It's common knowledge how reproduction works. You have condoms, birth control pills and copper rings among other options. That's simply not a reasonable argument. Don't move the goalposts now.

I'm not moving the goalposts. If you're a teenager and you don't use a condom or other means and get pregnant - that's on you. You wrote a long retort which ignored condoms. That's unreasonable. If you don't use a condom no matter what age you are and get an STD - same thing - that's on you too. Your argument about post-conception options - I agree that not everyone has the same access. But I'm not talking about that…

The comment that you wrote and that I quoted from just now is still right there for everyone to read. It's weird to write as if it wasn't.

(The comment I just replied to was edited extensively after I replied to it. That's OK; I said what I wanted to say.)

Post reply on HN