Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's generally helpful to be currently employed by the sponsoring company but the amount of time with that company has little bearing on the success.
Also A general followup. What is the recommended path to GC for a current holder of an H1B? Full 6 years first, or try and find I-140 immediately? another path?
I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
311–320 of 336 posts
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#3121. 500Startups invests $150K similar to YC and since I only have a single company incorporated in USA the investor visa doesn't seem applicable to me.
2. Getting an O1 visa is also may not be easy because I just got my undergraduate degree from the university and my only success story is the company that I have right now.
3. A few attorney suggested me to apply for an MBA program but it's expensive in San Francisco and I don't have enough time for that.
So what are my options right now? I was waiting for the startup visa that will go into effect on July 17 but it looks like Trump might kill it. I feed desperate right now since I really believe that I should stay here because our potential customer base is in SF and our growth rate can be much higher if we can live here.
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#313Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#314Hi, I'm a software developer with 9 months experience in a big company with a b.s. In computer science from a top European school. It seems impossible to get into the US at the moment, and my few attempts have failed. What should my expectations be in terms of getting a good company to accept to sponsor a visa in the current circumstances? Thank you very much for your AMA.
Have you tried J1?
This raises two issues: as a graduate, it would be hard to justify this visa unless I went to the US for a graduate degree, and it would not allow me to start long term career.
I would love to hear your thoughts about this, and thank you for your reply!
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#315Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see any issue as long as there's no compensation for this, no quid pro quo.
Ok thank you, that is a good news. If i support a non profit in raising 1 Million Dollars can i add that in my resume saying "Supported a Non Profit Organization In Fund Raising Nearly 1 Million Dollars"? or will this raise some flags?
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#317Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not a non-starter but the absence of direct reports would need to be overcome by a strong showing of indirect reports and a high degree of independent discretionary decision-making with respect to the function that you manage.
Thanks, that helps. For evidence of "high degree of independent discretionary decision-making", are certified notes from the company's senior executives and HR considered admissible? It sounds like this would be something that can warrant very strong justification.
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#318Earlier quoted context omitted.
E-2 or O-1.
What's the success rate of founders getting E-2's if they get funding from YC?
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a general rule, CBP and USCIS will not approve TNs for founders or owners of the sponsoring employer so your options would be an E-2 (based on an investment) or O-1.
Hi Peter, A follow up question for the E-2 Visa option. Am i correct in saying, as long as 50% of U.S business is Canadian owned, myself as well as other Canadian citizens can qualify as E-2 essential employees.
Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
#320Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read that you can have L1 visa for new office in the US if you already have an existing corporation outside the US.
I believe you are correct. The downside of L1 from what i read is that you have to maintain an office outside of United States. This is a bit difficult for startups with just the co-founders. Correct me if i am wrong.