Question: does Skype for Business (nee Lync) mirror these same UX changes as Skype makes them, or does it do its own thing? Because I'm guessing this is just Microsoft further differentiating their product categories: today's Skype is for consumers (ala Facebook Messenger), so it gets "cute" features at the expense of the ability to use it for productivity; while Skype for Business continues to be about efficient col…
New Skype Update Is Horrible
21–30 of 334 posts
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#22What could I switch to (on both Mac and PC) that would give me better video chat functionality? Edit: Just to clarify, here's what I'm looking for: 1. Free plan; available everywhere in the world (I have family outside the US). 2. Both Mac and PC clients that are actually good. 3. Video chat quality (including noise filtering and such) that matches or exceeds what Skype can do. 4. IM-like client that supports text, v…
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#23I have witnessed Skype to go from almost perfect video & chat communicator to absolute crap over almost 10 years, and I feel very sad that it has come to rip off Snapchat. There is no alternative like the old Skype now in the desktop.
It seems that over the years, their PM team is more confident (capable?) in keeping a good balance between core chat usability and all the "extras", perhaps because they are not playing catch-up in the market.
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#24Has skype ever been good? For as long as I can remember it was a necessary evil until we finally managed to replace it with Hangouts and the like.
...Has Hangouts ever been good? Like, I totally get complaining about Skype. The P2P stuff caused it to be kinda wonky. But your choice for "better" is Hangouts? Between the five or six alternative Google chat offerings, the attempts to merge it with the dialer and SMS apps, the cutting out of the online/offline statuses. Google Talk was great though, back in the day.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/9/14864552/google-hangouts-c...
https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/28/google-quietly-launches-me...
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#25Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#26Has skype ever been good? For as long as I can remember it was a necessary evil until we finally managed to replace it with Hangouts and the like.
I'd gladly use Slack, but group calls and screen share is a paid add on.
Hangouts has always had terrible performance in my experience.
Facetime works nice for one to one, but a lot of people don't have Macs, and again no group calls or screen share.
I liked Fuze, but then they pivoted to enterprise paid clients only.
Bluejeans is paid only and via Facebook IIRC.
What else is there?
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#27Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#281. It works. Every other video chat platform I have tried is simply unreliable and crashes. (Skype does so but with far less frequency).
2. Facetime is more reliable, true, but it is the only one and does not allow for group chat.
(I have thrown down the gauntlet, and I realize I risk major downvoting for making such a controversial statement, but I cannot sit in silence anymore).
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#29The worst part is that google hangout doest seem to work well anymore, the plugin crashes, etc.
Re: New Skype Update Is Horrible
#30What could I switch to (on both Mac and PC) that would give me better video chat functionality? Edit: Just to clarify, here's what I'm looking for: 1. Free plan; available everywhere in the world (I have family outside the US). 2. Both Mac and PC clients that are actually good. 3. Video chat quality (including noise filtering and such) that matches or exceeds what Skype can do. 4. IM-like client that supports text, v…