Denied Entry
daniel.haxx.se
Denied Entry
1–10 of 76 posts
Re: Denied Entry
#2Kudos to the QUIC working group for this absolutely correct response: "We won’t hold any further interim meetings in the US, until there’s a change in this situation."
Re: Denied Entry
#3Was it really necessary for him to refer to his Twitter follower count so many times?
Re: Denied Entry
#4Kudos to the QUIC working group for this absolutely correct response: "We won’t hold any further interim meetings in the US, until there’s a change in this situation."
Couldn't this hurt people in the US who want to go to a conference but would have trouble with reentry?
Re: Denied Entry
#5Kudos to the QUIC working group for this absolutely correct response: "We won’t hold any further interim meetings in the US, until there’s a change in this situation."
Couldn't this hurt people in the US who want to go to a conference but would have trouble with reentry?
Yes it can if you are referring to non-citizens.
Re: Denied Entry
#6[deleted]
Re: Denied Entry
#7Kudos to the QUIC working group for this absolutely correct response: "We won’t hold any further interim meetings in the US, until there’s a change in this situation."
Couldn't this hurt people in the US who want to go to a conference but would have trouble with reentry?
Yes, but it's better than the alternative.
Re: Denied Entry
#8Was it really necessary for him to refer to his Twitter follower count so many times?
> By the end of the Tuesday, I had about 2000 new followers
That's the only time he mentioned a number of followers.
Re: Denied Entry
#9Kudos to the QUIC working group for this absolutely correct response: "We won’t hold any further interim meetings in the US, until there’s a change in this situation."
Couldn't this hurt people in the US who want to go to a conference but would have trouble with reentry?
Since they have meetings rotating between multiple continents, the WG chair probably already knows about all participants for which this is an issue. They explicitly mention being aware of this problem in their announcement, but that they deem it less critical right now.
Re: Denied Entry
#10Was it really necessary for him to refer to his Twitter follower count so many times?
> By the end of the Tuesday, I had about 2000 new followers That's the only time he mentioned a number of followers.
"Several well-followed people retweeted me and that caused even more new followers and replies."
"By the end of the Tuesday, I had about 2000 new followers and twitter notifications that literally were flying by at a high speed."
"I’m now (end of Wednesday, 60 hours since the check-in counter) at 3000 more twitter followers than what I started out with this Monday morning."
Two direct references to a count, one indirect reference.