Earlier quoted context omitted.
So Wikileaks is now in the policy of filtering documents and release timings to shape a narrative? I seem to recall that their claim to fame was that they were above trying to manipulate the narrative and simply dumped documents when they got them. Why should we trust a cabal of people who are not telling us the full scope of the situation, and instead filtering what we know based on their desire to shape our opinion…
If they are trying to filter something, they are doing a pretty awful job. Everything released so far in Vault 7 appears to simply be a dump of intelligence collection tradecraft/methods.
*
The vault7 trove could contain documents on CIA minimization and targeting rules, which show that they carefully avoid US targets and only go for high value targets with these tools, and further could contain mostly exploits targeted at industrial/military targets.
Wikileaks has focused on how they could use the (selectively) released tools to target civilians.
By selecting to release only tools that (could) target civilian appliances, hiding the fact that most tools are built for, eg, industrial/military targets, and that CIA procedures focus on industrial/military targets, Wikileaks effectively shapes the narrative to be about how the CIA is targeting civilians, when the reality is that they're targeting high value, perfectly appropriate things (which just happen to occasionally use technology others do as well).
*
Sowing that kind of distrust between US civilians and one of their intel agencies would be a perfectly normal PSYOPs goal, and in-line with what you'd expect from, eg, RT.
That Wikileaks has decided to editorialize their content in such a way means that you now need to evaluate those kinds of scenarios when thinking about the things they release, instead of just focusing on the content. It reduces their brand value significantly.