Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

facebook.com

211–220 of 229 posts

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#211
post #75

It is both amazing and deeply concerning that one corporation has influence over 1/4 of the world's population. It is even more concerning when you consider the outsized voting power of 1 person at that company.

And even more concerning when you consider its a single-country owned corporation.

bow bow bowwww

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is mind-blowing. 2 billion total users an immense volume in and of itself but 2 billion even semi active users is incredible

Google's profile counts -- Android, Gmail, Youtube, and G+, mostly, in about that order, topped 3 billion a while ago. http://archive.is/zi4Uw (Origin site appears down.)

Only active users should be counted.

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#214

As insane as this number is, and it really is an incredible achievement, I'm left feeling Facebook hasn't delivered much real net positive value to the world just yet. Politics are in disarray. More people are "connected" online but more people than ever feel isolated in some way and mental health issues are on the rise. Highlight reels of your friends living a seemingly amazing life leave people feeling like they've…

Don't forget the ethically dubious psychological experiments performed on unwitting Facebook users.

Honestly I consider Facebook as an entity to be a net drain on the species in spite of whatever good it may have done.

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When was Facebook about improving society? Oh sure they'll do that as long as it doesn't jeopardize profits, but after all we've learned about their social engineering, social experimentation, pattern recognition and various mechanisms to maintain engagement, is it really right to pretend they are any different than any other large corporation? The dollar is the endgame, and if improving society becomes a profitable…

> The dollar is the endgame... Is that not equally true for just about every tech company we discuss here?

Of course.

Profit-seeking isn't inherently a bad thing.

Personally I measure their worth of these companies based on the damage they cause in the pursuit of that profit.

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you buy a coke, is there an email from coke in your inbox the next day? When you interact with coke does it gently tailor what you see and what you do not see, month after month? If you cannot understand how people are influenced, maybe you'll never see the influencing happening. That doesn't make you immune, on the contrary...

How does an automated email from FB that gets filtered into my FB folder that I never read actually influence me?

That's you. You do not represent everyone who uses Facebook.

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#217

As insane as this number is, and it really is an incredible achievement, I'm left feeling Facebook hasn't delivered much real net positive value to the world just yet. Politics are in disarray. More people are "connected" online but more people than ever feel isolated in some way and mental health issues are on the rise. Highlight reels of your friends living a seemingly amazing life leave people feeling like they've…

Facebook "works" in the same sense opium "works"

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The dollar is the endgame... Is that not equally true for just about every tech company we discuss here?

Of course. Profit-seeking isn't inherently a bad thing. Personally I measure their worth of these companies based on the damage they cause in the pursuit of that profit.

I contend that your formula is still incomplete. Yes, we absolutely should count the damage companies cause in pursuit of profit. We should also count the non-financial good they do. The spread of "fake news" is a bad thing. Connecting with other people who have the same disease, as another commenter mentioned, is a good thing. Count both. I'm not trying to say whether the net for Facebook or anyone else is positive or negative. I'm just saying that we should apply the same standard for every company, and it should be standard that includes all relevant data. Too often, I see different and/or incomplete standards used to praise some companies and condemn others.

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

for OSX blocking at DNS level: Posted a year ago in hn https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11793855 for linux use: https://github.com/tbds/FreeContributor/tree/master/data https://www.perpetual-beta.org/weblog/blocking-facebook-on-o...

> for linux use: https://github.com/tbds/FreeContributor/tree/master/data This appears to be broken.

https://github.com/jmdugan/blocklists

Re: Facebook Hits 2 Billion Users

#220
post #205

As insane as this number is, and it really is an incredible achievement, I'm left feeling Facebook hasn't delivered much real net positive value to the world just yet. Politics are in disarray. More people are "connected" online but more people than ever feel isolated in some way and mental health issues are on the rise. Highlight reels of your friends living a seemingly amazing life leave people feeling like they've…

I personally didn't have much use of Facebook until I started using it to connect with those who suffer the same illness as me. Then I realized I had a worldwide support group to tap into. That's pretty important to me and to the billions who use this platform.

Uncontrollable love of cats?
Post reply on HN