Live data from Hacker News

Sci-Hub as Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience

bjoern.brembs.net

141–144 of 144 posts

Re: Sci-Hub as Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a classic collective decision problem. If almost all postdocs at the same time decided to boycott closed journals, then this would work. However, in practice solutions are always failing whenever they are based on the idea that a majority has to voluntarily make the right move within a short time period, if that means smaller wins for people who do not make the move. To give another example of such a problem: If…

What if it's "kickstarted" with people pledging to submit papers to only a select few publishers once a critical mass of pledges have been received?

Good question. Finding ways to disincentivise defection would be key.

You might want to look up Mancur Olson's "Logic of Collective Action", which deals with this problem, generally.

Re: Sci-Hub as Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience

#142
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Again, that's understandable. Russians are afraid. And arguably, with good reason.

Afraid of what exactly that Stalin rule sounds safer? Celebrating someone like Stalin is not about feeling safer. It is about wanting to rule ruthlessly.

I don't know. You'd need to ask them.

But I'm pretty damn sure that fear is a big part of it. Fear of the enemy, the other, the foreign devils.

It's how the ruthless always trick the weak. As Göring put it in that infamous quote.

Re: Sci-Hub as Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience

#143
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't it be Elsevierum ? You need an accusative, and –er nouns tend to be second declension iirc.

Yes, accusative, but I'm not sure how to decline it :-) (apparently it's a Dutch name of Arab/Moorish origin, also spelt Elzevir).

Just occurred to me: We could consider it neutral, and then nominative = accusative...

Re: Sci-Hub as Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if it's "kickstarted" with people pledging to submit papers to only a select few publishers once a critical mass of pledges have been received?

Good question. Finding ways to disincentivise defection would be key. You might want to look up Mancur Olson's "Logic of Collective Action", which deals with this problem, generally.

Thanks for the lead!
Post reply on HN