I wonder if there's some similar primitive drive behind the unhealthy appetite for clickbait; a yearning for information that may help us to survive and reproduce. Some of the high-performing headlines seem to frame the information as something that will affect the reader personally.
We Analyzed 100M Headlines
21–30 of 49 posts
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#22Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#23Fascinating, if not depressing analysis of clickbait. I guess one of the sad takeaways is that people want to be told how to react when they read something (make you cry, give you goosebumps, shocked to see).
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#24The analysis of clickbait has a clickbait title itself, they even added brackets which are believed to increase CTR.
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is fairly well understood, as is the fact that none of the parties involved - Facebook, the media, or the political parties - have an ounce of incentive to change. So, what do we do? It may be becoming apparent that the theory that democracy does not work in a world with social media is correct, but what can be done with that information? For every Buzzfeed you kill there's another, for every social network with…
Sortition. Rule by random citizen.
"If you can't choose wisely, choose randomly"
https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-can-t-choose-wisely-choose-ran...
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#26The analysis of clickbait has a clickbait title itself, they even added brackets which are believed to increase CTR.
Sincere question: What is wrong with clickbait if the article fulfills the promise? The title here seems to be what the article is about.
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is fairly well understood, as is the fact that none of the parties involved - Facebook, the media, or the political parties - have an ounce of incentive to change. So, what do we do? It may be becoming apparent that the theory that democracy does not work in a world with social media is correct, but what can be done with that information? For every Buzzfeed you kill there's another, for every social network with…
Here, I have a proposal for you: Imagine a world government wherein the killing, torture, and imprisonment of people is illegal, as the core clause of the state. In this state, the core clause does not permit the interests of the state over those of the individual; the state exists to support an individual. Imagine a political party which comes to power through the co-option of the public sphere to support the above…
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#28The article reminds me strongly, and for similar reasons, of Clay Johnson's The Information Diet, a book I found overall tremendously disappointing -- this review describes most of the reasons:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/254961608?book_show_ac...
In particular, Johnson keeps presenting the situation of low-quality information as a matter of choice, whilst flagrantly ignoring two of the massive elephants in the room:
1. Search-engine and social-media rankings drive much of the engagement. A slight tweak to those algorithms can ... make Upworthy downworthy:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=upworthy
2. Agnotology. Culturally-induced ignorance, or slightly less charitably, those with more money than God lying to the world loudly enough to prevent any other message from being heard. The story of corporate-financed disinformation, and the persistence of it, even to the very same individals and organisations, over numerous campaigns -- lead, asbestos, tobacco, CFCs, nuclear power, and now fossil-fuel carbon emissions -- is absolutely depressing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt
And if you think the practice is new or particular to the present, it's not. There's a delightful little book, the transcript of a speech, by Hamilton Holt, Commercialism and Journalism. It's the text of an address he gave at U.C. Berkeley in 1909, on the phenomenal growth of the publishing industry, and of the advertising which fueled it. He quotes an anonymous publisher:
"There is no such thing in America as an independent press. I am paid for keeping honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. If I should allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation, like Othello's, would be gone. The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilivy, to fawn at the foot of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. We are the tools or vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. Our time, our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
https://archive.org/stream/commercialismjou00holtuoft#page/2...
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is fairly well understood, as is the fact that none of the parties involved - Facebook, the media, or the political parties - have an ounce of incentive to change. So, what do we do? It may be becoming apparent that the theory that democracy does not work in a world with social media is correct, but what can be done with that information? For every Buzzfeed you kill there's another, for every social network with…
Sortition. Rule by random citizen.
Re: We Analyzed 100M Headlines
#30The analysis of clickbait has a clickbait title itself, they even added brackets which are believed to increase CTR.