Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#1

Post by yankcrime » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 12:35 PM UTC

Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient
mistertea.github.io

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#2

Post by knz42 » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:12 PM UTC

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#3

Post by wwarren » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:14 PM UTC

knz42 wrote: post #2

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

Not OP, but the page says

> Mosh is a popular alternative to ET. While mosh provides the same core funtionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC).

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#4

Post by Matt3o12_ » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:14 PM UTC

knz42 wrote: post #2

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

According to their website (the third bullet point):

> mosh: Mosh is a popular alternative to ET. While mosh provides the same core funtionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC).

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#5

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:14 PM UTC

knz42 wrote: post #2

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

[deleted]

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#6

Post by ovi256 » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:14 PM UTC

knz42 wrote: post #2

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

>While mosh provides the same core functionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC).

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#7

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:23 PM UTC

[deleted]

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#8

Post by nitrix » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:25 PM UTC

How robust is this to man-in-the-middle attacks?

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#9

Post by fiatjaf » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:27 PM UTC

So it is mosh, but much better? I'll try it.

Re: Eternal Terminal: Remote terminal for the busy and impatient

#10

Post by nopcode » Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 1:27 PM UTC

knz42 wrote: post #2

Can you outline briefly what the benefit of this is compared to mosh?

Its also Apache 2.0 licensed, compared to the GPL3 that strangles Mosh.

Pity its not a freer license though.