Not very surprised, the game has been a trainwreck in the making from the beginning. Total scope was just way too overambitious, and people weren't going to plow hundreds and thousands of dollars into spaceship jpegs forever.
Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
11–20 of 85 posts
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#12I know SC initial funding is unprecedented, but is taking out what amounts to a line of credit really that uncommon? It doesn't necessarily mean the initial 150M has dried up -> thus the sky just may not be falling?
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#13Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#14Weird that Roberts didn't know better.
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#15Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#16Seems like incredibly poor budgeting given that they had $150M and couldn't deliver even a limited version of the game. Maybe I'm underestimating the costs somehow, but you could easily pay pretty high salaries for 100+ people's time over a few years of development with that kind of money. I wonder what they did with it?
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#17- Imagine: Star Citizen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJJ9TcGxhNY
- Star Citizen - MISC Freelancer Commercial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO7RxsZpcKc
- Star Citizen: Consolidated Outland Mustang Commercial : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR07oZC0QHU
- Introducing the 2944 Aurora: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvDs7RDKCag
Full playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVct2QDhDrB0QRjv9oN02...
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#18It's really important to understand finance if you want to understand the world and it's not that hard.
/thread
Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#19Re: Star Citizen is likely in financial trouble
#20I should point out that this is not necessarily a bad thing, nor is it clear what the loan is for. What this tells us is that money has been loaned and secured against assets owned by CIG - this is fairly common practice in the case of commercial loans.
To bank with Coutts you must have at least £1,000,000 in tangible assets and in any event they are selective about their clientele; which implies CIG is doing well.
To be honest as much as the terms are huge, they didn't go to a loan shark neither a shitty bank. It's the bank that manage the assets of the Queen. I don't think they give loan that easily hence the huge collaterals.