I only saw the movie, in the book did they ever mention why 42 is the meaning of everything?
It's "the answer to life, the universe, and everything", a result arrived at after a mind-bogglingly powerful computer thought for millennia. After revealing this result, it was soon discovered that the answer only made sense if one knew the question - which no one did. (If I'm recalling correctly.) But now we know the question is "what is pi perent of leet, rounded to the nearest integer?"
π% of 1337 ≈ 42
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#12I only saw the movie, in the book did they ever mention why 42 is the meaning of everything?
It's "the answer to life, the universe, and everything", a result arrived at after a mind-bogglingly powerful computer thought for millennia. After revealing this result, it was soon discovered that the answer only made sense if one knew the question - which no one did. (If I'm recalling correctly.) But now we know the question is "what is pi perent of leet, rounded to the nearest integer?"
Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#13Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#14Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#15I only saw the movie, in the book did they ever mention why 42 is the meaning of everything?
Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#16Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's "the answer to life, the universe, and everything", a result arrived at after a mind-bogglingly powerful computer thought for millennia. After revealing this result, it was soon discovered that the answer only made sense if one knew the question - which no one did. (If I'm recalling correctly.) But now we know the question is "what is pi perent of leet, rounded to the nearest integer?"
So they built a more-mind-bogglingly powerful computer to compute the question. You really should read the book(s) to find out what happens next...
Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#18Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
So they built a more-mind-bogglingly powerful computer to compute the question. You really should read the book(s) to find out what happens next...
maybe i'm a bit slow on the uptake this morning, but what's the book you're referring to..?
Re: π% of 1337 ≈ 42
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
So they built a more-mind-bogglingly powerful computer to compute the question. You really should read the book(s) to find out what happens next...
maybe i'm a bit slow on the uptake this morning, but what's the book you're referring to..?