Hmm. It seems that these chat applications are more and more becoming like a polished webmail system. Now they've introduced threads, it's searchable forever, you can mail erm. I mean send messages to individuals or even groups. This new technology is amazing. Seriously there is nothing wrong with using e-mail (apart from the dated protocol) and for knowledge sharing your team is better of with some kind of wiki with…
> Seriously there is nothing wrong with using e-mail (apart from the dated protocol) and for knowledge sharing your team is better of with some kind of wiki with organized information. I'm the co-founder of https://www.fwdeveryone.com , which implements the same sort of functionality on top of email. This way you can capture both the knowledge created within your organization, and also conversations between your cowo…
Twist – Mindful Team Communication
71–80 of 81 posts
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Seriously there is nothing wrong with using e-mail (apart from the dated protocol) and for knowledge sharing your team is better of with some kind of wiki with organized information. I'm the co-founder of https://www.fwdeveryone.com , which implements the same sort of functionality on top of email. This way you can capture both the knowledge created within your organization, and also conversations between your cowo…
Looks interesting. But from a qursory glance it appears to work with Gmail, and not with email?
Being able to use DKIM and SPF to authenticate threads is part of our value proposition, and a key part of the value proposition of email in general. (For example, being able to prove that you agreed on X project requirements with a certain person on a certain date.) Doing this type of authentication requires every message in a thread, not just the last one, so the most pragmatic way to meet this requirement is to work with email service providers with available APIs. The alternative is storing the entire contents of your inbox, but this doesn't make sense until we're ready to roll out our enterprise offering.
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#73Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#74Why not just use existing infrastructure of emails and integrate with that nicely? The channels on Twist could be folders on gmails (with google integration at first) and users could reply to threads from their favorite email client. If they want to use a dedicated app they could easily install the app.
I think this would help them with growth a lot more since it would use the existing infrastructure of emails. Of course, it doesn't solve the notifications problem that they are trying to solve but that's what the app is for.
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not just use email? This was asked by a ton of people and we have addressed it here: https://help.twistapp.com/hc/articles/115003654589 Email is great and we are fans of it, but not for internal team communication.
The question that immediately came to my mind was, "why not NNTP?"
The server/client mechanism is robust and scalable. With a good client UI, it could be turned into quite a smart social/work platform.
I've been toying with attempting such a NNTP client, but it's way down on my list of projects.
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#76again? this was on HN just recently, but now it is "mindful" - said it then, and will say it again, it looks like email, and find that the hassle of yet another communications tool not worth it in this case (basically email with a default "reply-to-all" permanently jammed in place).
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#77again? this was on HN just recently, but now it is "mindful" - said it then, and will say it again, it looks like email, and find that the hassle of yet another communications tool not worth it in this case (basically email with a default "reply-to-all" permanently jammed in place).
It was? I specifically searched HN for 'twist' and for the URL before posting - couldn't find it.
Re: Twist – Mindful Team Communication
#78Slack makes hard for companies to charge money for these apps. I think it is cool but probably not enough reason to make people to move. One thing that would make me consider it, if I could open multiple windows at the same time for example.
You can open multiple windows at the same time: https://cl.ly/1C0q0C022o1X/Screen%20Shot%202017-06-21%20at%2...