Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
201–210 of 329 posts
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#202Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#203- HEADLINE: Simplify contributing to Debian. - DESCRIPTION: TL;DR: Debian's web pages are hard to navigate and use and it's very hard to see what's happening. I contribute to FOSS projects whenever I have time and have been wanting to contribute to Debian, but the difficulty is offputting. I'm used to searching for the program name and arriving at a portal page from which I can easily browse the source, see the curre…
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#204HEADLINE: Create local copy of remote repos DESCRIPTION: Personally I'd like something like 'apt-get update --local' which pulled down a remote copy of every repo. That's be super handy for something like a build machine, and it'd reduce the need to install & maintain an Aptly repo.
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#205HEADLINE: list apt package dependencies DESCRIPTION: something like 'apt-get deps ' returning a list of all deps for a package. This would be super duper when trying to install a standalone package file on a system where the deps aren't already present.
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#206HEADLINE SELinux installed by default DESCRIPTION Not sure what else to say...
There is still some work needed for this to happen.
The SELinux support should be added in the debian-installer and the policy needs to be generic enough to support several (basic?) usecases.
The later is the difficult part, if the policy is not working for them, people will in most of the case just disable SELinux completely.
Having a list of well tested usecases (LAMP, DNS,...) that we could support would maybe be a good start.
Help is always welcome of course.
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has been part of the dpkg roadmap for some time now ( https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/RoadMap ). And something I'm slowly but progressively moving towards. But TBH it has been low priority. Knowing of projects that require it, and specifically which parts, or that are already using the static libdpkg library are very valuable, so that those parts can be improved. If there's enough interest, my plan could be t…
> Knowing of projects that require it, and specifically which parts, or that are already using the static libdpkg library are very valuable, so that those parts can be improved. What would be the best way of contributing this sort of information?
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#208Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#209- HEADLINE: Simplify contributing to Debian. - DESCRIPTION: TL;DR: Debian's web pages are hard to navigate and use and it's very hard to see what's happening. I contribute to FOSS projects whenever I have time and have been wanting to contribute to Debian, but the difficulty is offputting. I'm used to searching for the program name and arriving at a portal page from which I can easily browse the source, see the curre…
The difficulty gradient of onboarding is a significant contributor to attracting folks.
Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Debian 10 (“buster”)?
#210HEADLINE: Repurpose testing as a rolling release positioned for not-just-testing usage DESCRIPTION: There are users who'd like to use a non-corporate community distro but who don't need or want software to be as old as software in Debian stable. The standard answer is "use testing" (e.g. http://ral-arturo.org/2017/05/11/debian-myths.html ), but 1) security support for testing is documented to be slower than for stabl…