Live data from Hacker News

New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs

cfa.harvard.edu

91–100 of 111 posts

Re: New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs

#91
post #32
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not impossible, but rather unlikely. According to TFA, the partner star was much further out. Also, gas giant planets Jupiter's size are fairly common I thought (this knowledge may be outdated).

TFA? I'm getting "The Force Awakens". Or "Teach For America".

The Featured Article. (There are echoes of another F-word in there, mostly from the older abbreviation RTFM, but they are rather faint.)

Re: New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs

#92
post #63

I read it 'Paris'. I need some coffee.

Same here. I believe the effect is similar to that of a garden path sentence[1] except instead of discovering a grammatical inconsistency and having to backtrack to re-parse, the grammatical context misleads the lexical level so much so that we "see" 'Paris' where 'Pairs' actually exists. I suspect that the 'P' being capitalized further supports the 'Paris' misinterpretation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_…

Also, the weird English custom to capitalize most words in titles, but not in normal sentences, adds to the confusion here.

Re: New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs

#94
post #63

I read it 'Paris'. I need some coffee.

Same here. I believe the effect is similar to that of a garden path sentence[1] except instead of discovering a grammatical inconsistency and having to backtrack to re-parse, the grammatical context misleads the lexical level so much so that we "see" 'Paris' where 'Pairs' actually exists. I suspect that the 'P' being capitalized further supports the 'Paris' misinterpretation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_…

So semantic analysis of born in provides hints to the lexer, turning Pairs into Paris?

I can tell you it gets even more bizarre: I once misread "bluetooth is dead" as "IrDA is dead" and was like, "duh, no shit, Sherlock, how is this even a news?".

So, apparently, everything gets lexed right initially, then it goes to semantic analysis which figures out that some comms standard is dead, obviously IrDA is a comms standard which is virtually dead nowadays, this tidbit is fed back into the parser, which stabilizes on its final output: IrDA is dead. Kill me.

Re: New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs

#96
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same here. I believe the effect is similar to that of a garden path sentence[1] except instead of discovering a grammatical inconsistency and having to backtrack to re-parse, the grammatical context misleads the lexical level so much so that we "see" 'Paris' where 'Pairs' actually exists. I suspect that the 'P' being capitalized further supports the 'Paris' misinterpretation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_…

Also, the weird English custom to capitalize most words in titles, but not in normal sentences, adds to the confusion here.

US-English, I think. British-English headlines are less caps-heavy.
Post reply on HN