Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right. Watching the Noam Chomsky documentary, Manufacturing Consent, on YouTube really opened my eyes to this phenomena. Based on what I have observed recently, I think the decision was made some time ago on this, and we're being told what to think.
It's good to be skeptical but I think when you have preponderance of evidence in one way, it's not unreasonable to reach a conclusion. Remember Noam was the same guy who for political reasons did not want to believe Pol Pot was mowing through millions despite large amounts of information filtering out of the country corroborating the atrocities others claimed were taking place. Additionally, there is no need to "manu…
The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
81–90 of 253 posts
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, confirming that there is no public evidence which hard links Lazarus to DPRK. Just want everyone to know the facts.
What would a "hard link" be? A signed confession from the head of the DPRK military? Under the circumstances, barring classified intelligence (like the NSA may have), we are as sure as we can be.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I don't think this is the case here, specifically, propaganda isn't always about swaying people from anti- to pro-; it could be for swaying people from "they are bad, but not that dangerous" to "they are dangerous enough that we should intervene with force"
Right. Watching the Noam Chomsky documentary, Manufacturing Consent, on YouTube really opened my eyes to this phenomena. Based on what I have observed recently, I think the decision was made some time ago on this, and we're being told what to think.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's good to be skeptical but I think when you have preponderance of evidence in one way, it's not unreasonable to reach a conclusion. Remember Noam was the same guy who for political reasons did not want to believe Pol Pot was mowing through millions despite large amounts of information filtering out of the country corroborating the atrocities others claimed were taking place. Additionally, there is no need to "manu…
Did people think highly of Saddam in 2003?
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#85OK, so I know this is going to come up in the comments, but this is not remotely a baseless allegation. The Lazarus group (one of the names for the DPRK-associated APT group) is somewhat well known and is quite sophisticated. This is the same group that hacked Sony a few years back. And to preempt people who are going to chime in with "Sony was just some insider leaking data" there is extensive evidence showing it wa…
It's not been fully confirmed/established that Lazarus group == DPRK: see "false flag" from Kaspersky researchers https://www.wired.com/2017/05/wannacry-ransomware-link-suspe...
The public sentiment gains from drumming up a case against NK aren't measurably enhanced by this enough to justify the effort. I wouldn't think. But one never knows.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's good to be skeptical but I think when you have preponderance of evidence in one way, it's not unreasonable to reach a conclusion. Remember Noam was the same guy who for political reasons did not want to believe Pol Pot was mowing through millions despite large amounts of information filtering out of the country corroborating the atrocities others claimed were taking place. Additionally, there is no need to "manu…
Did people think highly of Saddam in 2003?
With regard to DPRK S Korea has great humint and we have multiple defectors corroborating each other (whereas Iraq there was basically one guy feeding intelligence services lies) so I would say it's not the same.
In addition, the regime provides all the evidence necessary (not just boastful claims) we sample the atmosphere as well as have seismometers corroborating their claims of nuclear development. There is no question as toward their progress nor their intentions.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
And this is based on what, exactly ? If you're going to make hyperbolic statements maybe some clarifications would be useful.
> And this is based on what, exactly ? The NSA developed the exploits that WannaCry was based on. The NSA lost control of its weapon (EternalBlue) in the Shadow Brokers leak and the world suffered economic damage as a consequence. The NSA doesn't seem interested in switching to a more defensive role where they will inform software makers of the security problems they find. Instead they seem intent on maintaining offe…
The offensive capability you state is part of their mission and is what NSA was created for.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
What would a "hard link" be? A signed confession from the head of the DPRK military? Under the circumstances, barring classified intelligence (like the NSA may have), we are as sure as we can be.
So we are unsure.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#89The NSA has lost all credibility, as far as I am concerned.
And this is based on what, exactly ? If you're going to make hyperbolic statements maybe some clarifications would be useful.
Re: The NSA has linked the WannaCry computer worm to North Korea
#90Maybe I'm old fashioned but I take any hacking blame from gov to gov as likely propaganda.
The idea that the US needs to actively spread propaganda about North Korea is pretty ridiculous. You are aware that they have been sending missiles on a regular basis and inviting criticism from pretty much everyone. Who exactly is pro-North Korea that the US is trying to sway ?