Tails 3.0 Released
tails.boum.org
Tails 3.0 Released
1–10 of 79 posts
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#2Those two changes seem particularly important:
* Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binaries are hardened with PIE which allows ASLR.
* Update Tor Browser to 7.0 (based on Firefox 52 ESR) which is multiprocess and paves the way to content sandboxing. This should make it harder to exploit security vulnerabilities in the browser.
What do you guys think about dropping 32-bit?
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#3Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
What do you guys think about dropping 32-bit?
About time.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#4Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
>What do you guys think about dropping 32-bit?
Nothing of value lost.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#5Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
32-bit is insecure. There's no good reason to support it. Get a cheap old laptop if you have 32-bit machine for some reason, it's good to have separate hardware for this type of thing anyway.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#6Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
Has there been any pure x86 processor in the last 10 year at all?
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#7This is great. I very much appreciate the work done by the contributors to the Tails project and I trust & agree with their technical decisions for this release. As Internet keeps getting more monitored, Tails serves as an important tool in maintaining the balance of privacy and allowing for the anonymous sharing of information going forward. Big thanks to the Tails team.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#8Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
I wonder if this will effect journalists and activists in parts of the world where old machines are still used (Africa, Middle East, parts of Asia). Not being able to make use of newer browser versions (without updating every time or taking the risk of using a persistent volume) could put them at greater risk.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#9Those two changes seem particularly important: * Tails 3.0 works on 64-bit computers only and not on 32-bit computers anymore. Dropping hardware support, even for a small portion of our user base, is always a hard decision to make but being 64-bit only has important security and reliability benefits. For example, to protect against some types of security exploits, support for the NX bit is compulsory and most binarie…
You can run Tails on a supercheap
chromebook. It seems a right product compromise.
Re: Tails 3.0 Released
#10https://tails.boum.org/news/version_3.0/index.en.html#news-v... says you should run "uname -m" under Tails to see if "your computer is 64-bit". How does that work? Does Tails automatically choose kernel version appropriate for your hardware, or what?