Kind of off-topic. But I had a thought the other day: without the US we wouldn't have action movies like James Bond or FPS and other shooters video games. It's interesting to see that guns are rare in other countries' movies/discussions. Maybe FPS would all be like Nintendo's octopus thing.
Pistol sights
31–40 of 331 posts
Re: Pistol sights
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did we just become best friends? Someone fire up the GoldenEye. Slappers only!
TBH, I was lying for comedic effect. I mostly play Borderlands 2 now. I don't like anything with too much strategy. //edit// Sorry if that sounds too rude. Email in my profile if you want my Steam ID.
> strategy
You've outed yourself, I'm afraid.
Re: Pistol sights
#33Former JSOC dude here. Circumstances requiring engaging with pistols == bad day for everyone, so only a few things matter. Front sight focus (which implies maintaining equidistance from the rear sight posts), both eyes open, fast presentation, parallel grip, smooth trigger pull, reacquire, repeat as necessary. And optical sights = more things that can break / run out of batteries / fall off and make noise / etc etc.
> Circumstances requiring engaging with pistols == bad day for everyone I've shot a bit, but only rimfire long guns, air rifles, and air pistols. The pistols were harder to shoot by a _long_ margin, and I can imagine it'd get orders of magnitude harder w/ more recoil, noise to promote flinching, etc. etc. So with your comments in mind, and my own limited experience, do you have any idea why every Police-critter here…
Re: Pistol sights
#34Instead of using convolution to produce the imagery, I think it should be produced using fractional Fourier transforms. IIRC fractional Fourier transforms are mathematically equivalent to Fraunhofer and Fresnel diffraction integrals. Although, the convolutions look good.
Within the Fresnel approximation, the output field can either be formed in a frequency-domain approach with a spectrum of plane waves or as a spatial superposition of paraboloid waves (in which the transfer function is inverse-fourier transformed and then convolved with the input field). And the latter approach is simply a convolution of the input field (in position space) with an impulse-response function of the linear (and shift-invariant) optical system between. Shift invariance (i.e. the response function itself isn't position dependent) is an okay approximation for the central FOV of the human eye.
So what he's doing, the formalism, is kinda correct within the Fresnel regime, only he uses an approximation for the impulse-response function itself. This impulse-response function is called the PSF or Point-Spread Function in imaging optics design, defined as the image (including diffraction effects of course) of a point source. His approximation as a disk is okay-ish, qualitatively (google "PSF of human eye defocus") but I didn't check the numbers for the size.
Re: Pistol sights
#35Kind of off-topic. But I had a thought the other day: without the US we wouldn't have action movies like James Bond or FPS and other shooters video games. It's interesting to see that guns are rare in other countries' movies/discussions. Maybe FPS would all be like Nintendo's octopus thing.
Re: Pistol sights
#36Kind of off-topic. But I had a thought the other day: without the US we wouldn't have action movies like James Bond or FPS and other shooters video games. It's interesting to see that guns are rare in other countries' movies/discussions. Maybe FPS would all be like Nintendo's octopus thing.
Dunno - James Bond is kind of English. Not just the character but the writer and the film production. The character was actually fairly closely based on the author http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/jamesbond/11026227/I...
Re: Pistol sights
#37Going target shooting is incredibly relaxing and a great break from the workday. The focus required to sight in a target and control one's breathing, arm, and finger movement is a very powerful relaxant to me and melts stress away. I work from home and I live in the burbs so pistol or rifle shooting is not possible. However, I've gotten really hooked on shooting (of all things) my Red Ryder BB gun. It doesn't make a…
Re: Pistol sights
#38Going target shooting is incredibly relaxing and a great break from the workday. The focus required to sight in a target and control one's breathing, arm, and finger movement is a very powerful relaxant to me and melts stress away. I work from home and I live in the burbs so pistol or rifle shooting is not possible. However, I've gotten really hooked on shooting (of all things) my Red Ryder BB gun. It doesn't make a…
Alas, BB guns are banned in my city, so I just go to the range. Airsoft in the living room too, but it's messy as the pellets tend to bounce out of the trap.
Re: Pistol sights
#39Competitive pistol shooters actually use several different sight picture styles.
In the speed styles of competitive shooting, the goal is to hit targets as fast as possible, so you want to make each shot in the "worst" way that will give you about a 95% chance of a hit. So for a close, low risk target, a shooter may look only at the target and ignore the sights, for a tiniest fraction more speed.
For most targets, the looking at the front sight is correct. Shooters tend to lock their upper body into one shape, then pivot it from target to target while shooting a string. This locks the rear sight in just the right place behind the front one. When the front sight is put on target, the rear sight is automatically in the right place. It's true that the target does become blurred a little when you do this.
Then for really far targets, you do have to bring your focus back a little farther, and see and care about both sights.
The sight picture is not the only thing that changes from target to target. You usually budget the amount of time spent for each shot.
Surprisingly, many pros know where their round will hit before it reaches the target. The time penalty for missing a shot is so high that it's almost always better to take a second shot in case of a miss. However, it takes a while for a pistol shot to reach the target, and for your eyes to see where it landed (plus you'd have to change your focus to look for it, then back again to your sights). To get around that, with practice, you can know in the moment you pull the trigger where the round went, and follow it up in about a twentieth of a second with another round.
In most competitive pistol matches, the sequence of targets to be shot on a given stage is not rigidly defined. There are often plenty of constraints (this group must be shot before these) or timing related constraints in some sports (shooting this target will cause a pair of targets to pop up in 1.2 seconds). Given this, there's a surprising amount of planning that goes into discovering the optimum run. The details of each shot are then worked out and mentally rehearsed.
Re: Pistol sights
#40Former JSOC dude here. Circumstances requiring engaging with pistols == bad day for everyone, so only a few things matter. Front sight focus (which implies maintaining equidistance from the rear sight posts), both eyes open, fast presentation, parallel grip, smooth trigger pull, reacquire, repeat as necessary. And optical sights = more things that can break / run out of batteries / fall off and make noise / etc etc.
> Circumstances requiring engaging with pistols == bad day for everyone I've shot a bit, but only rimfire long guns, air rifles, and air pistols. The pistols were harder to shoot by a _long_ margin, and I can imagine it'd get orders of magnitude harder w/ more recoil, noise to promote flinching, etc. etc. So with your comments in mind, and my own limited experience, do you have any idea why every Police-critter here…